The ‘urgencies’ of implementing an RRI approach in EU-funded law enforcement technology development
Between frameworks and practice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15736178 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stergios Aidinlis (0000-0001-8464-0416, Durham University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-20 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Responsible Innovation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2329-9037 • E-ISSN: 2329-9460 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23299460.2024.2390198 |
| OpenAlex | W4405674473 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 48 |
RRI aspirations are complicated by two kinds of ‘urgency' in the field of EU-funded security research: the timeframe and requirements for such technologies often present researchers with ‘urgency' due to the sensitive nature of the security domain and it is ‘urgent' for building societal trust in security technology that RRI approaches shall be introduced and effectively implemented in the lifecycle of developing such technologies. Drawing on experience from an H2020-multidisciplinary project, this article presents the gap between the top-down formal frameworks and bottom-up practice of designing and implementing RRI approaches under conditions of ‘urgency’ and time pressure. In the case of EU-funded security research, it is argued, there are still significant practical challenges which hinder the effective implementation of RRI approaches, potentially limiting the extent to which such approaches deliver meaningful impact. The paper reflects on these challenges, as well as on potential strategies to overcome them in the future
Business · Enforcement · Law and economics · Political science · Public relations · Responsible Research and Innovation · Sociology · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · Information and Cyber Security · Law · Public Administration · Technology Assessment and Management
The Rise of Big Data Policing
Publish or Perish
Improving Policing
The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It Is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation
Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services
A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation
Building Bridges Between Researchers and Police Practitioners in Small and Midsize Law Enforcement Agencies in the United States
A comprehensive appraisal of responsible research and innovation
The evolving relationship between police research and police practice
Researcher–practitioner partnerships and crime analysis
Policing and research
Police–academic partnerships
Ending the ‘dialogue of the deaf’
Predict and Surveil
How scientists view the public, the media and the political process
Innovating innovation policy
Where are the politics in responsible innovation? European governance, technology assessments, and beyond
Challenges in the implementation of responsible research and innovation across Horizon 2020
Looking beyond the ‘horizon’ of RRI
Synthesizing an implementation framework for responsible research and innovation
An unfinished journey? Reflections on a decade of responsible research and innovation
Innovation, value-neutrality and the question of politics
Responsible research and innovation
RRI legacies
The Sensationalist Discourse of Science Diplomacy
Not so unique after all? Urgency and norms in EU foreign and security policy
Fixing Technology with Society
The past and future of RRI
Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from ‘Elsa’ to ‘RRI’
Responsible research and innovation
| Highly cited | No |
|---|