Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Regulating animals with gene drive systems

Lessons from the regulatory assessment of a genetically engineered mosquito

Bibliographic Data

ID15736209
AuthorsZahra Meghani (0000-0002-7181-5296, University of Rhode Island, corresponding author), Jennifer Kuzma (0000-0003-4456-9613, North Carolina State University)
Year2017
Volume5
Issuesup1
PagesS203-S222
Publication date2017-12-19
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Responsible Innovation (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2329-9037 • E-ISSN: 2329-9460
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/23299460.2017.1407912
OpenAlexW2776998888
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited28

For the purposes of conservation or suppression of species, gene drive technology has significant potential. Theoretically speaking, with the release of even relatively few animals with gene drive systems in an ecosystem, beneficial or harmful genes could be introduced into the entire wild-type population of that species. Given the profound impact that gene drives could have on species and ecosystems, their use is a highly contentious issue. Communities and groups have differing beliefs about nature and its conservation or preservation, as well as concerns about the ecological safety of the eradication, replacement or enhancement of particular species of animals by means of genetic engineering. For all those reasons, the rigorous regulation of insects and other animals with gene drive systems is crucial. In this paper, we consider the question of whether the United States Food and Drug Administration is prepared to effectively regulate insects and other animals with gene drives

Biology · CRISPR · Ecosystem · Environmental health · Gene · Gene drive · Genetically modified organism · Population · Animal Genetics and Reproduction · CRISPR and Genetic Engineering · Insect behavior and control techniques · Medicine · Biotechnology · Ecology · Genetics

  • Regulating Gene Editing in the Wild

    Open Access•Karen J Maschke, Michael K Gusmano•The Hastings Center Report•2021

  • Does Gene Editing in the Wild Require Broad Public Deliberation

    Open Access•Gregory E Kaebnick•The Hastings Center Report•2021

  • Democratizing Risk Governance

    Open Access•Monica Gattinger•Democratizing Risk Governance•2023

  • Responsible innovation in biotechnology

    Open Access•Pat Roberts, Joseph R Herkert et al.•Elementa Science of the…•2020

  • Regulation of genetically engineered (GE) mosquitoes as a public health tool

    Open Access•Zahra Meghani•Globalization and Health•2022

  • Cataloguing the barriers facing RRI in innovation pathways

    Open Access•Jennifer Kuzma, Pat Roberts•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2018

  • Mapping research and governance needs for gene drives’

    Open Access•Jason A Delborne, Jennifer Kuzma et al.•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2018

  • Responsible innovation scholarship

    Open Access•Erik Fisher, Mareike Smolka et al.•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2024

  • Gene drives and the expanding horizon of governance

    Open Access•Erik Fisher•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2018

  • Gene Drives as Interventions into Nature

    Open Access•Keje Boersma, Bernice Bovenkerk et al.•NanoEthics•2023

  • Procedurally Robust Risk Assessment Framework for Novel Genetically Engineered Organisms and Gene Drives

    Open Access•Jennifer Kuzma•Regulation & Governance•2021

  • Genetically Engineered Animals, Drugs, and Neoliberalism

    Open Access•Zahra Meghani•Journal of Agricultural and…•2017

  • Narrative policy framework at the macro level—cultural theory-based beliefs, science-based narrative strategies, and their uptake in the Canadian policy process for genetically modified salmon

    Open Access•Teshanee T Williams, Jennifer Kuzma•Public Policy and Administration•2022

  • Regulation and regime

    Open Access•Scott L Greer, Benjamin D Trump et al.•Policy Sciences•2019

  • Designs on Nature

    Sheila Jasanoff•Designs on Nature•2005

  • The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Evaluation of the Safety of Animal Clones

    Open Access•Zahra Meghani, Inmaculada De Melo-Martín•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2009

  • A roadmap for gene drives

    Open Access•Jennifer Kuzma, Fred Gould et al.•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2017

  • From risk to uncertainty in the regulation of GMOs

    Open Access•F Wickson•New Genetics and Society•2007

  • Ethics of Risk Analysis and Regulatory Review

    Open Access•Jennifer Kuzma, John C Besley•NanoEthics•2008

  • The “Revolving Door” between Regulatory Agencies and Industry

    Open Access•Zahra Meghani, Jennifer Kuzma•Journal of Agricultural and…•2010

  • Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Food and Neoliberalism

    Open Access•Zahra Meghani•Journal of Agricultural and…•2014

  • Genetically Engineered Animals, Drugs, and Neoliberalism

    Open Access•Zahra Meghani•Journal of Agricultural and…•2017

  • Science policy and moral purity

    Open Access•Paul B Thompson, Paul Β Thompson•Agriculture and Human Values•1997

  • Brief History of Neoliberalism

    Desley J Harvey, David Harvey et al.•BRIEF HISTORY OF NEOLIBERALISM.•2005

  • "Recasting "Substantial Equivalence

    Open Access•L Levidow, Joseph Murphy et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2007

Citations per year1.56
Citation span2017 - 2024 (8)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae