Why Add “Abolition” to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine’s Social Care Framework

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15744647
AutoresLaura M Gottlieb (0000-0003-2669-4066, University of California, San Francisco, autor de correspondencia), Stacy Tessler Lindau (0000-0002-9054-6538, University of Illinois Chicago), Monica E Peek (0000-0003-0434-7231, University of Chicago Medical Center)
Año2022
Volumen24
Número3
PáginasE170-180
Fecha de publicación2022-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe AMA Journal of Ethic (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2376-6980 • E-ISSN: 2376-6980
EditorialAmerican Medical Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1001/amajethics.2022.170
PMID35325517
OpenAlexW4221056052
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas10

Abundant evidence demonstrates that enduring, endemic racism plays an important role in determining patient health. This commentary reviews a patient case about disease self-management and subsequent health outcomes that are shaped by social and economic circumstances. We analyze the case using a framework for social care developed in 2019 by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). We then propose that the NASEM framework be adapted by adding the category abolition , which could make the other social care practices transformative for historically marginalized populations

Criminology · Engineering ethics · Health care · Pedagogy · Political science · Public health · Racism · Social medicine · Sociology · Transformative learning · Engineering · Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations · Healthcare Systems and Challenges · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Racial and Ethnic Identity Research