Is Consent to Autopsy Necessary? Cartesian Dualism in Medicine and Its Limitations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15744835 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Megan Lane (0009-0005-4051-4203, corresponding author), Christian J Vercler (0000-0002-2015-4213, Institute of Medical Ethics) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 771-778 |
| Publication date | 2016-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The AMA Journal of Ethic (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2376-6980 • E-ISSN: 2376-6980 |
| Publisher | American Medical Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.8.ecas2-1608 |
| PMID | 27550560 |
| OpenAlex | W2513941723 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 2 |
When a hospitalization ends in death, a request for an autopsy can lead to an emotionally charged encounter between a physician and the deceased patient's family. A case is presented in which a cardiac surgeon, believing he might have made a mistake, requests an autopsy, but members of the deceased patient's family believe that she would not have wanted an autopsy performed. A central question discussed in this commentary is whether and when consent for autopsy is necessary. We discuss two theoretical frameworks that support differing views on this question. Beyond engaging this philosophical discussion, we also highlight a practical approach to discussing an autopsy with a grieving family by using the case presented
Autopsy · Mistake · Pathology · Political science · Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Medicine · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Psychology
| Citations per year | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |