How Should Clinicians and Organizations Assess Risks and Benefits of First-in-Human Implantation of Investigational Devices
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15745105 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Beatrice L Brown (Brigham and Women's Hospital, corresponding author), Aaron S Kesselheim (0000-0002-8867-2666, Brigham and Women's Hospital) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | E673-678 |
| Publication date | 2021-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The AMA Journal of Ethic (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2376-6980 • E-ISSN: 2376-6980 |
| Publisher | American Medical Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2021.673 |
| PMID | 34710025 |
| OpenAlex | W3197972770 |
| Language | EN |
The number of new medical devices cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) through the 510(k) pathway that has subsequently been associated with safety risks has led to discussion of approaches to regulation and communication of device risks. As debate continues over whether the pathway needs to be altered, features of ethical use of 510(k)-cleared devices can include (1) heightened caution with respect to newly cleared 510(k) products until adequate data are gathered through postmarket surveillance, (2) facilitating informed consent by improving physician and patient knowledge of the 510(k) pathway, and (3) basing distribution of these devices on individual risk assessments while ensuring equitable access
Business · Clinical trial · Investigational Drugs · Medical physics · Biomedical and Engineering Education · Medicine · Internal Medicine
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |