Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How Should Clinicians and Organizations Assess Risks and Benefits of First-in-Human Implantation of Investigational Devices

Bibliographic Data

ID15745105
AuthorsBeatrice L Brown (Brigham and Women's Hospital, corresponding author), Aaron S Kesselheim (0000-0002-8867-2666, Brigham and Women's Hospital)
Year2021
Volume23
Issue9
PagesE673-678
Publication date2021-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe AMA Journal of Ethic (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2376-6980 • E-ISSN: 2376-6980
PublisherAmerican Medical Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1001/amajethics.2021.673
PMID34710025
OpenAlexW3197972770
LanguageEN

The number of new medical devices cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) through the 510(k) pathway that has subsequently been associated with safety risks has led to discussion of approaches to regulation and communication of device risks. As debate continues over whether the pathway needs to be altered, features of ethical use of 510(k)-cleared devices can include (1) heightened caution with respect to newly cleared 510(k) products until adequate data are gathered through postmarket surveillance, (2) facilitating informed consent by improving physician and patient knowledge of the 510(k) pathway, and (3) basing distribution of these devices on individual risk assessments while ensuring equitable access

Business · Clinical trial · Investigational Drugs · Medical physics · Biomedical and Engineering Education · Medicine · Internal Medicine

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae