Judging Doctors—The Person and the Professional
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15745290 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nadia N Sawicki (0000-0002-8307-3867, Chicago Kent College of Law, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | 718-722 |
| Publication date | 2011-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The AMA Journal of Ethic (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2376-6980 • E-ISSN: 2376-6980 |
| Publisher | American Medical Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1001/virtualmentor.2011.13.10.msoc1-1110 |
| PMID | 23137893 |
| OpenAlex | W12756216 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
If society values physicians because they possess valuable clinical skills and exercise those skills with a fiduciary ethic of care toward their patients, we ought to evaluate physicians on those grounds directly, rather than looking to their behavior “after hours.”
Duty · Fiduciary · Medical education · Patient care · Political science · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.29 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2022 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |