How Should Complex Communication Responsibilities Be Distributed in Surgical Education Settings
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15747115 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bradley M Dennis (0000-0002-2419-2102, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, corresponding author), Allan B Peetz (0000-0002-9655-3210, Vanderbilt University Medical Center) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 431-438 |
| Publication date | 2018-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The AMA Journal of Ethic (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2376-6980 • E-ISSN: 2376-6980 |
| Publisher | American Medical Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.5.ecas2-1805 |
| PMID | 29763389 |
| OpenAlex | W2802887028 |
| Language | EN |
Part of any trauma surgeon's job is communicating effectively in difficult, often time-limited, situations. The ability to effectively discuss topics like goals of care in these settings has a direct effect on patient care. Many factors contribute to the complexity of these conversations, including patient, physician, surrogate, and system-specific factors. In responding to the case of Mr. D and Dr. J, we attempt to outline and analyze some of the moral challenges and ethical questions that this professional responsibility poses to trauma surgeons and trainees
Medical education · Patient care · Political science · Professional responsibility · Ethics in medical practice · Medicine · Nursing · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Patient Dignity and Privacy · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |