How Should Treatment of Animals Beyond the Lab Factor Into Institutional Review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15747188 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Laurie Sellars (0000-0001-9662-072X, Yale University, corresponding author), Jeff Sebo (0000-0002-8997-3217, Institute of Medical Ethics) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | E716-723 |
| Publication date | 2024-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The AMA Journal of Ethic (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2376-6980 • E-ISSN: 2376-6980 |
| Publisher | American Medical Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2024.716 |
| PMID | 39250944 |
| OpenAlex | W4402298924 |
| Language | EN |
Discussions of nonhuman research ethics tend to focus on what we owe nonhuman research subjects in laboratory settings only. But humans make critical decisions about these animals outside the lab, too, during breeding, transportation, and end-of-study protocols. This article reviews extra-lab risks and harms to nonhuman research subjects, focusing on the most commonly and intensively used animals like rodents and fishes, and argues that extra-lab risks and harms merit ethical consideration by researchers and institutional review
Factor (programming language · Political science · Programming language · Animal testing and alternatives · Computer Science · Medicine
| Highly cited | No |
|---|