When Should Screening and Surveillance Be Used during Pregnancy

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15747891
AutoresNancy D Campbell (0000-0003-0993-526X, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, autor de correspondencia)
Año2018
Volumen20
Número3
Páginas288-295
Fecha de publicación2018-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe AMA Journal of Ethic (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2376-6980 • E-ISSN: 2376-6980
EditorialAmerican Medical Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.3.msoc1-1803
PMID29542439
OpenAlexW2793589349
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas9

Using the ethical and legal concept of shared responsibility for healthy births, this article considers social, cultural, and historical contexts in which medicalization and criminalization have worked in tandem to widen surveillance in ways that intensify scrutiny of women's lives under the guise of child protection, bringing women who are pregnant, postpartum, or parenting under criminal justice control. Although pregnant and postpartum women are prime candidates for medication-assisted treatment (MAT), the expanding carceral system has not prioritized drug treatment or reproductive justice. This article investigates ethical and historical dimensions of the question, According to which principles and practices should screening and surveillance be carried out to reduce harm, safeguard civil and human rights-including reproductive autonomy-and ensure that treatment, when necessary, occurs in the least coercive settings possible

Autonomy · Criminalization · Criminology · Economic Justice · Environmental health · Harm · Medicalization · Political science · Population · Psychiatry · Reproductive health · Reproductive rights · Scrutiny · Sociology · Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse · Law · Medicine · Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Contraception