Who Makes Decisions for Incapacitated Patients Who Have No Surrogate or Advance Directive
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15747909 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Scott J Schweikart (American Medical Association, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | E587-593 |
| Publication date | 2019-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The AMA Journal of Ethic (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2376-6980 • E-ISSN: 2376-6980 |
| Publisher | American Medical Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2019.587 |
| PMID | 31333174 |
| OpenAlex | W2953568165 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
Unrepresented patients are those who have no surrogate or advance directive to guide medical decision making for them when they become incapacitated. While there is no perfect solution to the problem of making medical decisions for such vulnerable patients, 3 different approaches are noted in the literature: a physician approach, an ethics committee approach, and a guardianship approach. Recent policies and laws have required an approach that is "tiered" with respect to both who is involved and the gravity of the medical treatment questions at issue. In a general sense, some variant of a tiered approach is likely the best possible solution for jurisdictions and health institutions-both those already with and those without a tiered approach-to the challenging puzzle of treating unrepresented patients
Directive · Medical decision making · Medical emergency · Computer Science · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Medicine · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.75 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |