Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessing fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth obturated with four different root canal sealers

An in-vitro study

Bibliographic Data

ID15796147
AuthorsPankaj Priyadarshi (0000-0001-9049-3678, Rama Dental College Hospital & Research Centre, corresponding author), Asheesh Sawhny (0000-0002-8053-5202, Rama Dental College Hospital & Research Centre, corresponding author), Baljeet Singh Hora (Rama Dental College Hospital & Research Centre, corresponding author), Saakshi Agarwal (Rama Dental College Hospital & Research Centre, corresponding author), Rohit Kumar (0000-0001-8334-9344), Rohit Vishal Kumar (Rama Dental College Hospital & Research Centre, corresponding author), Sumedha Sumbria (0000-0002-8444-2353, Rama Dental College Hospital & Research Centre, corresponding author)
Year2022
Pages12588-12597
Publication date2022-06-02
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Health Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2550-696X • E-ISSN: 2550-6978
PublisherUniversidad Tecnica de Manabi (PUBLISHER • EC)
DOI10.53730/ijhs.v6ns2.8337
OpenAlexW4281645986
LanguageEN

Background: This study aims to evaluate fracture resistance on endodontically treated teeth when four unique sealers are being used. Materials and Methods: 75 human premolars (mandibular) recently extracted were utilised for this analysis. Random categorization of selected samples into 5 different groups depending on the type of sealer applied in the canal. Group 1: RCTpex sealer, Group 2: MTA Fillapex sealer, Group 3: Seal-Pex sealer, Group 4: Traditional zinc oxide-eugenol sealer, Group 5: Control (un-obturated tooth). Universal testing equipment (IIT, Kanpur) was used to assess fracture force after the teeth were inserted in acrylic cubes. Statistical analysis used one way ANOVA and test of post-hoc. All the groups had significant findings (P < 0.05) statistically. Results: Groups one and two presented more excellent fracture endurance as compared to other groups. Furthermore, there was no noteworthy difference between group three and four or group four and five statistically. Conclusion: The group of resin sealer was found to be more successful than other groups in this in vitro study. The ZOE sealer group and the control group, however, showed no significant differences

Root canal · Significant difference · Statistical analysis · Zinc oxide eugenol · Dental materials and restorations · Dental Radiography and Imaging · Dentistry · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Materials Science · Mathematics · Medicine · Orthodontics

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae