Infrastructure failure cascades quintuple risk of storm and flood-induced service disruptions across the globe
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 15803003 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Evelyn Mühlhofer (0000-0002-5587-9070, ETH Zurich, autor de correspondencia), David N Bresch (0000-0002-8431-4263, Zürich Airport (Switzerland)), Elco E Koks, Elco Koks (0000-0002-4953-4527, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 7 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 714-729 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | One Earth (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2590-3322 • E-ISSN: 2590-3330 |
| Editorial | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.oneear.2024.03.010 |
| OpenAlex | W4394944121 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 11 |
| Referencias citadas | 53 |
Society is dependent on critical infrastructure that provides basic services such as healthcare, mobility, communications, and power. Severe weather can damage these vital infrastructure assets, disrupting services. Such disruptions can further escalate due to system interdependencies. Although research increasingly evaluates physical risks to infrastructure assets, knowledge on service disruption risks from natural hazard-induced failure cascades across networked infrastructure systems remains limited. Here, we couple an open-source risk model with a complex network-based infrastructure module to simulate spatially explicit service disruptions from 700 historic floods and tropical cyclones in 30 countries. We find that failure cascades account for 64–89% of service disruptions, which also spread beyond the hazard footprint in nearly 3 out of 4 events. Disruption-affected population surpasses estimates of physically affected by up to ten-fold. We demonstrate that knowledge of the effect of infrastructure network designs, population distribution, wealth, and hazard characteristics can help prioritize systemic adaptation strategies over asset-focused ones
Asset (computer security · Business · Cascading failure · Climate change · Computer security · Critical infrastructure · Economics · Electric power system · Environmental resource management · Extreme weather · Flood myth · Geography · Hazard · Interdependence · Natural hazard · Population · Power (physics · Risk analysis (engineering · Service (business · Systemic risk · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Environmental Science · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
From asset damage to service disruption
Examining the relationship between weather-related power outages and disaster risk perception
Wind-Induced Electric Power Interruption
Impact-based risk assessment of coastal infrastructure adaptation to climate change
Flood Impacts on Civil Infrastructure Systems
Quantifying Expressway Traffic Resilience to Freezing Rain
Flood risk prediction and priority management area identification under SSP-RCP scenarios
Enhancing interdependent infrastructure systems resilience in post-disaster recovery
A Critical Review of Infrastructure Resilience in Fast-Growing, Hot, and Arid Cities of the Global South
Mapping School Accessibility in Africa
Deciphering technological advancements for efficient disaster management and community resilience
Global maps of travel time to healthcare facilities
Satellite imaging reveals increased proportion of population exposed to floods
Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks
The impact of flooding on road transport
A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets
The International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS)
Empirical patterns of interdependencies among critical infrastructures in cascading disasters
Social vulnerability and equity perspectives on interdependent infrastructure network component importance
On The Quantitative Definition of Risk
Disruption of emergency response to vulnerable populations during floods
Infrastructure for sustainable development
| Obras citantes distintas | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 11 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 10 |