Aligning NIH’s Indirect Cost Recovery Rates With Foundation Rates Is Bad Policy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15808165 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sherry A Glied (New York University), Sherry Glied (0000-0001-9432-1662, Wagner College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | e251700-e251700 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-17 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | JAMA Health Forum (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2689-0186 • E-ISSN: 2689-0186 |
| Publisher | American Medical Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1700 |
| PMID | 40244619 |
| OpenAlex | W4409528009 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
This JAMA Health Forum discusses recent guidance from the National Institutes of Health regarding the indirect cost recovery rate and its potential to diminish US science research and increase the influence of foundations on the operations of US universities
Foundation (evidence · Political science · Health and Medical Research Impacts · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare cost, quality, practices · Law
| Highly cited | No |
|---|