Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Erasmus and the Jews

Bibliographic Data

ID16346606
AuthorsShimon Markish, Anthony Olcott, Steven Rowan (0000-0001-8026-0758)
Year2009
Volume28
Issue3
Pages85-87
Publication date2009-01-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueRenaissance and Reformation (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0034-429X • E-ISSN: 2293-7374
PublisherUniversity of Toronto Libraries - UOTL (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.33137/rr.v28i3.11674
OpenAlexW2038818466
LanguageEN
Citations received2

of Rotterdam was greatest Christian humanist scholar of Northern European Renaissance, a correspondent of Sir Thomas More and many other learned men of his time, known to his contemporaries and to posterity for subtlety of his thought and depth of his learning. He was also, according to some modern writers, an anti-Semite. In this complete analysis of all of Erasmus' writings on and Judaism, Shimon Markish asserts that accusation cannot be sustained. For Markish, to ask whether was a friend or enemy of is to ask a modern question of a sixteenth-century man, whose attitude can best be called asemitism. Erasmus' chief preoccupation was with future of the true philosophy of Christ; he had little interest in Jewish community of his own time. Erasmus and Jews discusses Erasmus' critique of Mosaic law and his view of conflict between as legalistic morality and Jesus' teaching; his judgment on Pharisees of Jesus' time; his emphasis on importance of study of Hebrew; and his opinions of sixteenth-century Jews. This meticulous analysis reveals an who defended his vision of true piety by rejecting Judaizing Christians more than and who saw Old Testament as integral to Christian worldview. As a Christian, he regretted nonbelief and pitied unbelievers, without vicious hostility toward any single people. His theological opposition to a form of religious thought which he identified with Judaism was not translated into crude prejudice against actual Jews. In general, his calm consideration of strange and foreign and his willingness to restrict his judgments to philosophical realm were, Markish argues, early and significant steps toward enlightened toleration. Markish's discussion of is supplemented with an Afterword by theologian and philosopher Arthur A. Cohen, who offers a variant interpretation of Erasmus' writings and attitudes. The juxtaposed arguments of two scholars make this an especially illuminating work for any student of and his influence. Erasmus and Jews also gives a necessary clarity to our understanding of meaning of anti-Semitism and history of religious toleration. Markish's profound knowledge of allows him to demonstrate thefundamentalimportance of putting arguments and terminology in context of a thinker's work and hisown time

Art history · Atheism · Epistemology · Erasmus · Humanism · Judaism · Morality · New Testament · Piety · The Renaissance · Theology · Classics · History · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity · Religious Freedom and Discrimination · Religious studies

  • Jewish Persecutions and Weather Shocks

    Open Access•Robert W Anderson, Noel D Johnson et al.•The Economic Journal•2017

  • John Foxe and the Jews

    Open Access•Sharon Achinstein•Renaissance Quarterly•2001

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0.08
Citation span2001 - 2017 (17)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae