"Sagacious Beyond Praise"? Winfield Scott and Anglo-American-Canadian Border Diplomacy, 1837-1860
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16529900 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Scott Barry Kaufman (0000-0002-1648-8034, corresponding author), scott kaufman, John Soares, John A Soares |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 57-82 |
| Publication date | 2006-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Diplomatic History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0145-2096 • E-ISSN: 1467-7709 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-7709.2006.00538.x |
| OpenAlex | W2030838784 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 5 |
General Winfield Scott is one of the important but underappreciated figures in U.S. diplomatic history.1 A hero of the War of 1812 and the Mexican War whose exploits largely have been obscured by the battlefield performances of generals on both sides of the Civil War, Scott was known as a vain and pompous man, one whose aristocratic bent and preference for professional armies over popular militias left him out of step with the growing democratization of American life.2 In contrast to William Henry Harrison's rugged sobriquet, “Old Rough ‘n Ready,” Scott was known as “Old Fuss and Feathers.” One biographer described Scott as “an aristocrat of the old school, and a good deal of a snob.”3 Theodore Roosevelt referred to him as “a wholly absurd and flatulent personage.”4 One of Scott's aides noted that “the chief ruling passion of the general was ambition and its uniform attendant, jealousy.”5 Ulysses S. Grant, once an officer under Scott's command, noted that his former commander “could bestow praise upon [himself ] with the least embarrassment.”6 After Scott finally claimed the Whig presidential nomination he long coveted in 1852, he was decisively thrashed in the general election by the eminently forgettable Franklin Pierce.7 When Scott died, one newspaper commented that Old Fuss and Feathers “acts like a god and talks like a fool.”8 In many respects, Scott and Jackson were diametrically opposed: where Jackson was seen as the champion of average Americans, Scott appeared an aspiring aristocrat; while Jackson used militia to good effect during his victory over the British at New Orleans, Scott believed war was a matter best left to professional soldiers. Their differences, in fact, led to one confrontation early in Scott's career that involved a heated exchange of letters and Jackson's issuance of a challenge to Scott to duel. Fortunately, the tension was defused without the discharge of pistols.9
Art · Art history · Diplomacy · HERO · Literature · Nomination · Political science · Politics · Praise · Presidential system · Spanish Civil War · American Constitutional Law and Politics · American History and Culture · Canadian Identity and History · History · Law
| Citations per year | 0.06 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2009 - 2009 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |