Wealth, Power, and the New International Order
Britain and the American Challenge in the 1920s
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16530673 |
|---|---|
| Authors | BRIAN McKERCHER, B J G McKercher (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1988 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 411-442 |
| Publication date | 1988-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Diplomatic History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0145-2096 • E-ISSN: 1467-7709 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-7709.1988.tb00035.x |
| OpenAlex | W2087535621 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 24 |
In response to a question on my part, Mr. Lippmann expressed the opinion that the “Big Navy Movement” in the United States was by no means entirely due to a determination never again to allow another country to “write the rules of maritime warfare” as we did during the recent war. That determination, he said, was, of course, a factor in the movement, but a less important factor than the vague desire of Americans (which the “Big Navy” people would be able more or less successfully to ferment so long as the Anglo-American naval controversy continued), to show us in particular, and the world in general, that they are now “top dog.” A dominant theme in the historiography of twentieth-century international relations is that Britain's decline as the preeminent global power, and its replacement by the United States, began during World War I and was confirmed in the 1920s. It is argued that this reversal resulted from an unprecedented increase in American economic strength that outweighed any advantages Britain possessed. A recent analysis of American relations with Europe after 1918 puts it succinctly: “The United States emerged from the Great War as the world's leading nation.”2 Neither the latter study nor others that have been produced in the past two decades and share its thesis suggest that Britain had been completely eclipsed by the United States.3 Nonetheless, the general tenor of all of them is that Britain's fate was sealed by the end of the 1920s and that because of the successful economic challenge mounted by the United States during the war, and because of the diplomatic and armed potential that economic power implied, Britain's inevitable decline had begun
Economic history · Economics · Historiography · International relations · Navy · Order (exchange · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Theme (computing · World War II · Australian History and Society · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law · World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
British Strategic Withdrawal from the Western Hemisphere, 1904–1906
Apostles of Collective Security The L. N. U. and its Functions
A British high commissioner for Canada, 1927–28
Anglo-American Corporatism and the Economic Diplomacy of Stabilization in the 1920s
Civil Service Traditions and the League of Nations
Great Britain and the Coolidge Naval Disarmament Conference of 1927
Financial Aspects of International Relations
Anglo-American Financial Rivalry in the 1920s
The League of Nations Union and Collective Security
The Anglo-French Compromise on Arms Limitation, 1928
"Reassessing "Uncle Shylock
The Geneva Protocol of 1924 for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes1
The Practical Working of The Mandates System
The Geneva Protocol
The Economic Restoration of the World
A Sane and Sensible Diplomacy
Britain and the ‘Great Betrayal’
Belligerent Rights in 1927–1929
VII. Great Britain and the League Council Crisis of 1926
Our Foreign Loan Policy
Britain's Economy Between the Wars
Gentlemanly capitalism and British expansion overseas II
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,15 |
| Citation span | 1993 - 2002 (10) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |