Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An End to Indifference

America's Korean Policy During World War II

Bibliographic Data

ID16531444
AuthorsJames I Matray (0009-0008-5939-1209, corresponding author)
Year1978
Volume2
Issue2
Pages181-196
Publication date1978-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDiplomatic History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0145-2096 • E-ISSN: 1467-7709
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-7709.1978.tb00430.x
OpenAlexW2028091500
LanguageEN
Citations received2

The long tradition of American indifference to Korea was destroyed by World War II. Until then, American disinterest was completely justified. The United States possessed no vital security interests in that peninsula and had no reason to have a policy regarding that nation. Korean affairs were the exclusive concern of closer and more powerful neighbors—China, Russia, and Japan. Korea was, in fact, the strategic focal point of northeast Asia and, as a result, the Korean people were the long-suffering victims of great power rivalry throughout most of their history.1 In the aftermath of World War II, Korean affairs again centered around the struggle for influence among external powers. The only difference was that in 1945 the United States emerged as a principal contestant in the competition to determine Korea's destiny. Pearl Harbor forced the United States to alter its Asian policy and formulate a course of action that would promote peace and security in the Pacific after the defeat of Japan. The success of America's postwar policy in Asia would require, in part, the emergence of a stable government in Korea capable of self-defense and worthy of international diplomatic support. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his advisers clearly recognized that, in the absence of positive action to achieve such a result, renewed competition for influence and control in Korea would take place. Quite obviously, Korea's future depended upon the ability of the Allies to cooperate in the negotiation of an agreement that would protect the interests of all nations directly involved in the peninsula. As a result, the Roosevelt administration came to advocate an international trusteeship for Korea in an effort to eliminate this strategic area as a potential source of tension and conflict in the postwar world

Alliance · China · Competition (biology · Destiny (ISS module · Diplomacy · East Asia · Economics · Expansionism · Foreign policy · Government (linguistics · Great power · International relations · Manifest destiny · Negotiation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Rivalry · Security interest · Sociology · Vietnam War · World War II · Asian Culture and Media Studies · Japanese History and Culture · Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies · Law

  • The Kuriles Controversy

    Marc Gallicchio•Pacific Historical Review•1991

  • Korea's war at 60

    James I Matray•Cold War History•2011

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0.06
Citation span1991 - 2011 (21)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae