Singapore ́s Bilateral Trading Arrangements in the Context of East Asian Regionalism
State of Play, Issues, and Prospects
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16624847 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Linda Low (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 2004 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 240-254 |
| Publication date | 2004-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Southeast Asian affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0377-5437 • E-ISSN: 1793-9135 |
| Publisher | ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute (PUBLISHER • SG) |
| DOI | 10.1355/seaa04p |
| OpenAlex | W1980332303 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 7 |
With the World Trade Organization's (WTO) Cancun ministerial meeting of September 2003 failing as an interim stocktaking for the Doha round sched uled for completion by January 2005, it can be expected that the momentum for will grow. Distinguished from as eco nomic regionalization, the political economy of the new regionalism since the 1980s is driven by globalization, information technology, knowledge-based economy, deregulation, and strategic/security interests. More unilateral, bilateral, trilateral, plurilateral, and cross-regional free trade agreements (FTAs) and regional trade agreements (RTAs) have been notified to the WTO as a response to mismanaged multilateralism, perceived or otherwise. The new regionalism seems like a realignment of the traditional triad, made up of the European Union (EU), the North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA), and the emerging East Asian regionalism. In East Asia, a burgeoning China within the ASEAN Plus Three (APT) co-operative framework is altering the dynamics of ASEAN as well as the old Japanese-led flying-geese pattern of trade and foreign direct investment (FDI).1 Even the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum seems lost given the new regionalism and intramural APEC difficulties. Non-completion of the ASEAN Free Trade Area by 2002 and synchrony with the new regionalism as WTO wanes have prompted individual ASEAN countries to enter into bilateral FTAs. An ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) by 2020 ? proposed by Singa pore at the 2002 ASEAN summit ? as an FTA-plus but not quite a customs union, albeit with some common market features,2 may muddle through much like the ASEAN 2020 vision enunciated at the 1998 ASEAN summit, in the absence of resolute political will. ASEAN's geographic and buffer value between a rising China and an eclipsing Japan has nonetheless attracted FTA offers from Australia and New Zealand (which constitute a Common Eco nomic Relations, or CER, partnership between themselves), Japan, India, and the United States.3
Business · China · Context (archaeology · Development economics · East Asia · Economics · Economy · Geography · International trade · Political science · Politics · Regionalism (politics · State (computer science · Economic Zones and Regional Development · Global trade and economics · Law
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,09 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2015 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |