Thailand ́ S Independent Agencies Under Thaksin
Relentless Gridlock and Uncertainty
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16625292 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alex M Mutebi, Alex Mutebi (0000-0002-4433-5166, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 2006 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 303-321 |
| Publication date | 2006-04-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Southeast Asian affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0377-5437 • E-ISSN: 1793-9135 |
| Publisher | ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute (PUBLISHER • SG) |
| DOI | 10.1355/seaa-06r |
| OpenAlex | W2053873791 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 3 |
Present-day Thailand has a more stable and transparent political system than in the past, when frequent changes in government, often by military intervention, seemed to be the leitmotif of the Thai polity. The last coup in 1991, followed by events in May 1992, where security officers killed at least 50 unarmed civilians during street confrontations in Bangkok, shocked the Thai political system and stimulated a marked change in the kingdom's democratic consolidation. Since then, not only have the armed forces kept out of the operation of the civilian government, but there have also been five successful elections with peaceful transitions. In addition, Thailand's political party system has grown increasing stable over time. In January 2001, Thaksin Shinawatra's Thai Rak Thai (TRT) party almost won an absolute majority in the first general election under the new charter, and subsequently absorbed a variety of factions and parties into its fold. During the February 2005 General Elections, TRT established the first-ever popularly elected single party administration as it convincingly defeated four other parties. The 2005 elections were a watershed in Thailand's as TRT's victory ensured the Prime Minister's hegemonic control over parliament and other key state institutions without the need for coalition partners, legitimizing his seeming insolence towards democratic consultation.1 Whether one labels his regime as semi-authoritarian, soft-authoritarian, diminished democracy, or simply delegated democracy, there is little doubt that Thaksin's administration has shown greater authoritarian tendencies in comparison to his immediate
Gridlock · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics · Law · Public Administration · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2008 - 2009 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |