Anonymous Works and Their Ascription to Famous Authors
Are They Cases of Mistaken Identity of an Outright Forgery
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16645434 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ismail K Poonawala (1 University of California at Los Angeles, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue | 2-3 |
| Pages | 404-410 |
| Publication date | 2015-05-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Arabica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0570-5398 • E-ISSN: 1570-0585 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1163/15700585-12341353 |
| OpenAlex | W322801214 |
| Language | EN |
The false attribution of anonymous works to famous authors is not unique to Islamic tradition in general and to Ismāʿīlī tradition in particular. Rather it is a very old problem dating back to ancient Greeks. The students of philosophy are familiar with this question as a number of spurious books circulated in the Middle Ages known as “pseudo-Aristotelian” or “pseudo-Ammonius.” However, the scholars have succeeded to disentangle the genuine from the counterfeit by using various critical tools at their disposal. In what follows I have tried to demonstrate that both Minhāǧ al-farāʾiḍ and Kitāb al-Yanābīʿ are falsely ascribed to the famous Ismāʿīlī law giver al-Qāḍī l-Nuʿmān. Any scholar who is fully familiar with the whole corpus of al-Nuʿmān’s works, especially with his numerous works on jurisprudence, would reject Cilardo’s claim to the contrary
Aesthetics · Art · Ascription · Authorship attribution · Counterfeit · Epistemology · Falsity · Fiqh · Greeks · Identity (music · Islam · Linguistics · Literature · Political science · Sharia · Theology · Classics · Families in Therapy and Culture · Islamic Studies and History · Islamic Thought and Society Studies · Law · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |