Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Exploring the social without a separate domain for religion

On actor-network theory and religion

Bibliographic Data

ID16646168
AuthorsMika Lassander (Åbo Akademi University, corresponding author), Peik Ingman (Åbo Akademi University)
Year2012
Volume24
Pages201-217
Publication date2012-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis (CONFERENCE)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0582-3226 • E-ISSN: 2343-4937
PublisherScripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.30674/scripta.67427
OpenAlexW1536616384
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited5

In post-secular societies—after secularisation—it may increasingly be the case that the connecting and structuring of religious matter is done outsidedesignated religious sites and without appointed religious experts. The centres of calculation have changed and so the connections between these are different. The former ways of translation and ordering are transforming into new ones. By exiting the designated sites religious matter has found new freedom with the new associations and inventions in the processes of translation. Less control leads to more heterogeneous agencies and facilitates the mobility of religious materials. This less controlled mobility of religious actants can also produce an apparent increase of religious matter, but this does not necessarily mean the return of religion. In any case, this increased plurality combined with increased mobility calls for perspectives which can recognise novelty, andnot just in comparison with previous states of affairs. Actor-network theory (ANT) is about tracing the webs of associations between myriad actants whose collective actions produce what we call ‘society’. Dismissing the notion of ‘the social’ as a kind of ‘stuff ’, ANT insists that sociology should focus on the interactional processes—the circulation of ‘the social’ among human and non-human actants—collectively assembling emerging states of affairs

Actor–network theory · Epistemology · Political science · Secularization · Social science · Sociology · Information Systems Theories and Implementation · Law · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Social Representations and Identity

  • Eat, Shit, Scar

    J Sage Elwell•Postscripts The Journal of Sacred…•2021

  • Mapping the Memories of 'Living on Light

    Open Access•Ilona Raunola•Approaching Religion•2024

  • What is there to sustain? Ontological imaginaries and the existence and agency of gods, Tūpuna, and everything else

    Open Access•Linde Draaisma, Stewart Lockie•Environmental Science & Policy•2025

  • Altars for the Morrigan

    Áine Warren•Journal of Contemporary Religion•2020

  • Science in action

    Bruno Latour•Science in action•1987

  • Actor network theory and after

    John Hassard, John Law•Actor network theory and after•1999

  • Notes on the theory of the actor-network

    Open Access•John Law•Systemic Practice and Action…•1992

  • Situated Knowledges

    Donna Haraway•Feminist Studies•1988

  • Vibrant Matter

    Jane Bennett, Jane Foress Bennett•Vibrant Matter•2020

Citations per year0.67
Citation span2020 - 2025 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae