"Muriel Rukeyser's "The Book of the Dead
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16654130 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Meryl Altman (0000-0003-3522-9895, corresponding author), Tim Dayton |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 146 |
| Publication date | 2004-04-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0732-7730 • E-ISSN: 1936-1645 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/20455181 |
| OpenAlex | W432745845 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
Book of the by Rukeyser was published as part of her 1938 volume 1. The poem, which is probably the most ambitious least understood work of Depression-era American verse, commemorates the worst industrial accident in U.S. history, the Gauley Tunnel tragedy. In this terrible disaster, an undetermined number of men likely somewhere between 700 800 died of acute silicosis, a lung disorder caused by prolonged inhalation of silica dust, after working on a tunnel project in Fayette County, West Virginia, in the early 1930s.After many years of relative neglect, Book of the has recently returned to print has become the subject of critical attention. In Muriel Rukeyser The Book of the Dead, Tim Dayton continues that study by characterizing the literary political world of Rukeyser at the time she wrote Book of the Dead.Rukeyser poem clearly emerges from 1930s radicalism, as well as from Rukeyser deeply felt calling to poetry. After describing the world from which the poem emerged, Dayton sets up the fundamental factual matters with which the poem is concerned, detailing the circumstances of the Gauley Tunnel tragedy, establishes a framework derived from the classical tripartite division of the genres epic, lyric, dramatic. Through this framework, he sees Rukeyser presenting a multifaceted reflection upon the significance, particularly the historical significance, of the Gauley Tunnel tragedy. For Rukeyser, that disaster was the emblem of a history in which those who do the work of the world are denied control of the vast powers they bring into being.Dayton also studies the critical reception of Book of the determines that while the contemporary response was mixed, most reviewers felt that Rukeyser had certainly attempted something of value significance. He pays particular attention to John Wheelwright critical review to the defenses of Rukeyser launched in the 1980s 1990s by Louise Kertesz Walter Kalaidjian. The author also examines the relationship between Marxism as a theory of history governing Book of the the poem itself, which presents a vision of history.Based upon primary scholarship in Rukeyser papers, a close reading of the poem, Marxist theory, Muriel Rukeyser s Book of the Dead offers a comprehensive compelling analysis of Book of the Dead and will likely remain the definitive work on this poem
Scrap Modernism
Women and poets see the truth arrive”
Respirators, Not Furnished
Something like Bringing the Entire Life”
Proletarian Literature from the Bottom Up
Negative Entropy and the Energy of Utopian Potential in Muriel Rukeyser’s The Book of the Dead”
The senses of Muriel Rukeyser's The Book of the Dead
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2012 - 2024 (13) |
| Highly cited | No |