The Question of “Allusiveness” and Canto 39
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16672964 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel R Kempton (SUNY New Paltz, corresponding author), Daniel Kempton (SUNY New Paltz) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 241-246 |
| Publication date | 2017-10-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | ANQ A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles Notes and Reviews (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0895-769X • E-ISSN: 1940-3364 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0895769x.2017.1311779 |
| OpenAlex | W2610385456 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
My title cites a phrase in William K. Wimsatt Jr. and Monroe C. Beardsley’s “The Intentional Fallacy,” and my excuse for returning to an article published seventy years ago is that the question the
Art · Biology · CITES · Excuse · Fallacy · Linguistics · Literature · Phrase · Political science · Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity · History · Law · Medieval Literature and History · Narrative Theory and Analysis · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|