Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Building evidence on what works (and what does not)

Practical guidance from the World Health Organization on post-project evaluation of adolescent sexual and reproductive health projects

Bibliographic Data

ID16763032
AuthorsSusan Igras (0000-0001-9836-9479, Georgetown University’s Institute for Reproductive Health, Center for Child and Human Development, 3300 Whitehaven Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA, corresponding author), Marina Plesons (0000-0003-3224-618X, World Health Organization), Venkatraman Chandra-Mouli (World Health Organization), Venkatraman Chandra‐Mouli (0000-0001-6937-4842, World Health Organization)
Year2021
Volume36
Issue5
Pages811-815
Publication date2021-06-03
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Policy and Planning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0268-1080 • E-ISSN: 1460-2237
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/heapol/czab028
PMID33778890
OpenAlexW3150053649
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited4

Over the past 25 years, there has been significant progress in increasing the recognition of, resources for, and action on adolescent health, and adolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH) in particular. As with numerous other health areas, however, many of the projects that aim to improve ASRH are implemented without well-thought-out plans for evaluation. As a result, the lessons that projects learn as they encounter and address policy and programmatic challenges are often not extracted and placed in the public arena. In such cases, post-project evaluation (PPE) offers the possibility to generate learnings about what works (and does not work), to complement prospective studies of new or follow-on projects. To fill the gap in the literature and guidance on PPE, the World Health Organization developed The project has ended, but we can still learn from it! Practical guidance for conducting post-project evaluations of adolescent sexual and reproductive health projects. This article provides an overview of the guidance by outlining key methodological and contextual challenges in conducting PPE, as well as illustrative solutions for responding to them

Environmental health · Family planning · Political science · Population · Public relations · Reproductive health · Reproductive rights · Research methodology · Sexual and reproductive health and rights · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations · Global Maternal and Child Health · Medicine · Psychology

  • Female genital mutilation

    Open Access•Kathya Cordova-Pozo, Hisham Hussein Imam Abdalla et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2024

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae