Rethinking the Right to Freedom of Thought
A Multidisciplinary Analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16764576 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sjors Ligthart (0000-0001-6458-4058), Christoph Bublitz (0000-0002-9877-2847), Thomas Douglas (0000-0002-6788-3608), Thomas A Douglas (0000-0003-1314-1905), Lisa Forsberg (0000-0002-5239-393X), Gerben Meynen (0000-0001-7298-8407) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2022-09-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human Rights Law Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-7781 • E-ISSN: 1744-1021 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/hrlr/ngac028 |
| OpenAlex | W4312830833 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
In recent years, there has been increased academic interest in the human right to freedom of thought (RFoT). Scholars from various disciplines are currently debating the content and scope of this right. In his annual thematic report of 2021, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief paid explicit and comprehensive attention to the RFoT, encouraging further clarification of the content and scope of the right. This paper aims to contribute to this end, setting the stage for further research, by offering a multidisciplinary analysis of the RFoT’s scope, relation to other rights, practical significance and moral foundations
Academic freedom · Content (measure theory) · Epistemology · Freedom of thought · Human rights · Multidisciplinary approach · Political science · Qualitative research · Relation (database) · Scope (computer science) · Social science · Sociology · Thematic analysis · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Computer Science · Law · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |