The shadow of the civil war

The memory of the Civil War has become one of the most vibrant and contested subjects in nineteenth-century American history over the past two decades. Studies of Civil War memory potentially can reveal much about the cultural, political, and intellectual world of the Civil War, Reconstruction, and the Gilded Age. Whereas the Civil War has often been studied in historical isolation, histories of memory thrust off the standard constraints of periodization to emphatically link the Civil War with late nineteenthcentury history. David W Blight's award-winning synthesis Race and Reunion (2001) both indicates the topic's rapid maturation and heightens the need for a historiographical excursion to assess the collective strengths and weaknesses of this burgeoning subfield. The following essay explores the convergence of factors, both within and outside of the historical profession, which have encouraged the boom in memory studies. In addition, it traces the emerging historiography to examine both the creative diversity of the field as well as its common assumptions, insights, and strategic limits

Collective memory · Diversity (politics · Historiography · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Sociology · Spanish Civil War · History · Latin American and Latino Studies · Law · Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis

• American While Black

  Niambi Michele Carter•American While Black•2019

  Add to list

• Dred Scott and Gettysburg in Tullock’s constitutional mythology and Civil War memory

  Open Access•Daniel Kuehn•Constitutional Political Economy•2024

  Add to list

• The Reputation of the Slave Trader in Southern History and the Social Memory of the South

  Michael Tadman•American Nineteenth Century History•2007

  Add to list