Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation and Healthcare
Unanswered questions in Theory and Policy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16779231 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Smita Srinivas (Columbia University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2008-12-18 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revista Econômica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1517-1302 • E-ISSN: 1517-1302 |
| Publisher | Pro Reitoria de Pesquisa, Pos Graduacao e Inovacao - UFF (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.22409/economica.10i2.p113 |
| OpenAlex | W2262596964 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
Intellectual property regimes are usually presumed to exert positiveinducements on technological innovation. However, given the dire nature ofaccess to critical health technologies for most of the world’s population, it isworth revisiting this assumption for health technologies. This paper situatesintellectual property rights (IPRs) for health technologies at the intersectionof three fields: innovation studies, welfare theories, and international politicaleconomy. It revisits the conceptual underpinnings of property rights with particularrelevance for needs of today’s industrializing, or so-called “developing”countries. This paper argues that the debates on IPR have poorly exploredcounterfactuals in pharmaceuticals and biotechnologies where other meansof inducement may exist and innovations may arise in conditions where IPR iseither absent or irrelevant. To do this, it first discusses utility as a basis for IPRsand the challenges –philosophical, theoretical and most importantly, practical- intranslating this to real-world use. It draws on history to analyze pharmaceuticalprior drug generations and alternate inducements. The article offers a novelconceptual framework to study innovation in developing contexts where IPR can be specifically situated. If the real goal is accessible and affordable healthcare- anissue of immense importance worldwide- then we may need to cease barking upthe wrong tree of intellectual property rights
Conceptual framework · Economic growth · Economics · Health care · Health technology · Intellectual property · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Population · Public economics · Situated · Social science · Sociology · Innovation Policy and RD · Intellectual Property and Patents · Law · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|