Emerging Issues
Pharmaceuticals and Patents in Developing Countries
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16779296 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cristina Possas (0000-0002-2886-2812, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2008-12-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revista Econômica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1517-1302 • E-ISSN: 1517-1302 |
| Publisher | Pro Reitoria de Pesquisa, Pos Graduacao e Inovacao - UFF (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.22409/economica.10i2.p114 |
| OpenAlex | W2553857022 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 3 |
This article analyses the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) debateon pharmaceuticals, an issue introduced by TRIPS, a World TradeOrganization(WTO) Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual PropertyRights which included pharmaceuticals as subject to patents, equivalent toany other product in the market. Available research results indicate that patentinglife saving products, such as antiretroviral (ARV) drugs, is controversial, since itcreates a temporary monopoly and restricts circulation of knowledge, delayinginnovation and leading to a significant increase in the prices of drugs. In Brazil,in 1996, the country immediately complied to this international agreement andimplemented a National Industrial Property Law in many aspects more restrictivethan TRIPS, with detrimental impacts on the national pharmaceutical enterprises.Contrasting with the Brazilian IPR option, China and India adopteda different strategy and waited for a decade to build their national capacity forresearch and development for pharmaceuticals and ARV drugs, before decidingto comply to TRIPS. We discuss the consequences of these three different policyoptions, examining the implications of the premature compliance of Brazil toTRIPS and anticipating its possible impacts on the successful country’s policyof free and universal access to ARV
Access to medicines · Agriculture · Business · China · Developing country · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Intellectual property · International trade · Market access · Market economy · Monopoly · Political science · Public economics · TRIPS Agreement · TRIPS architecture · World trade · Engineering · Innovation Policy and RD · Intellectual Property and Patents · Law · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |