Contraindicated use of modern contraceptives among mothers from a Pelotas Birth Cohort
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16780109 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gbènankpon Mathias Houvèssou (0000-0003-3401-2547, Universidade Federal de Pelotas), Simone Farías-Antúnez (0000-0002-1546-4217), Andréa Dâmaso Bertoldi (0000-0002-4680-3197, Universidade Federal de Pelotas), Mariela Felisbino Da Silveira (0000-0002-2861-7139, Universidade Federal de Pelotas) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 2 |
| Publication date | 2024-02-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revista de Saúde Pública (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-8910 • E-ISSN: 0034-8910 |
| Publisher | Universidade de São Paulo. Agência de Bibliotecas e Coleções Digitais (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005585 |
| PMID | 38381892 |
| OpenAlex | W4393312483 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 8 |
OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of contraindicated use of combined hormonal contraceptives, progesterone-only contraceptives, and intrauterine devices in mothers participating in the 2015 Pelotas Birth Cohort according to the WHO medical eligibility criteria. METHODS: The biological mothers of children belonging to the 2015 Pelotas birth cohort who attended the 48-month follow-up were studied. The 48-month follow-up data were collected from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. Contraindicated use of modern contraceptives was considered to occur when these women presented at least one of the contraindications for the use of modern contraceptives and were using these methods. The prevalence of contraindicated use was calculated according to each independent variable and their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS: The analyzed sample consisted of 3,053 women who used any modern contraceptive method. The prevalence of contraindicated use of modern contraceptives totaled 25.9% (95%CI: 24.4-27.5). Combined hormonal contraceptives showed the highest prevalence of contraindicated use (52.1%; 95%CI: 49.3-54.8). The prevalence of contraindicated use of modern contraceptives methods was greater in women with family income between one and three minimum wages, a 25-30 kg/m2 body mass index, indication by a gynecologist for the used method, and purchasing the contraceptive method at a pharmacy. The higher the women's education, the lower the prevalence of inappropriate use of modern contraceptives. CONCLUSION: In total, one in four women used modern contraceptives despite showing at least one contraindication. Policies regarding women's reproductive health should be strengthened
Cohort · Cohort study · Developed country · Environmental health · Family planning · Gynecology · Obstetrics · Population · Research methodology · COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction · Demography · Male Reproductive Health Studies · Medicine · Reproductive Health and Contraception
Contraception and health
Research electronic data capture (Redcap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
The Contraindications to Combined Oral Contraceptives among Reproductive-Aged Women in an Obstetrics and Gynaecology Clinic
Uso de contracepção e desigualdades do planejamento reprodutivo das mulheres brasileiras
Factors associated with the contraindicated use of oral contraceptives in Brazil
Prevalência de uso de métodos contraceptivos e adequação do uso de anticoncepcionais orais na cidade de Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil
Dinâmica do atendimento em planejamento familiar no Programa Saúde da Família no Brasil
Uso de métodos anticoncepcionais e adequação de contraceptivos hormonais orais na cidade de Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |