Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Structural complexity predicts consensus readability in online discussions

Bibliographic Data

ID16859244
AuthorsRafik Hadfi (0000-0003-2352-1936, Kyoto University, corresponding author), Takayuki Ito (0000-0001-5093-3886, Kyoto University)
Year2024
Volume14
Issue1
Publication date2024-03-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Network Analysis and Mining (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1869-5450 • E-ISSN: 1869-5469
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s13278-024-01212-1
OpenAlexW4392370696
LanguageEN
References cited46

The intricate relationship between structure and function spans various disciplines, from biology to management, offering insights into predicting interesting features of complex systems. This interplay is evident in online forums, where the organization of the threads interacts with the message’s meaning. Assessing readability in these discussions is vital for ensuring information comprehension among diverse audiences. This assessment is challenging due to the complexity of natural language compounded by the social and temporal dynamics within social networks. One practical approach involves aggregating multiple readability metrics as a consensus alignment. In this study, we explore whether the structural complexity of online discussions can predict consensus readability without delving into the semantics of the messages. We propose a consensus readability metric derived from well-known readability tests and a complexity metric applied to the tree structures of Reddit discussions. Our findings indicate that this proposed metric effectively predicts consensus readability based on the complexity of discourse structure

Comprehension · Data science · Information retrieval · Readability · Computer Science · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Text Readability and Simplification · Topic Modeling · Artificial Intelligence

  • Discourse Quality Index

    Open Access•André Bächtiger, Marlène Gerber et al.•Research Methods in Deliberative…•2022

  • Mapping and Measuring Deliberation

    André Bächtiger, John Parkinson•Mapping and Measuring Deliberation•2019

  • Rhetorical Structure Theory

    William C Mann, Scott A Thompson et al.•Third Text•1988

  • Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel

    J Peter Kincaid, Jr Fishburne et al.•1975

  • A Mathematical Theory of Communication

    Claude E Shannon•Bell System Technical Journal•1948

  • Functional Linguistics

    Robert D Van Valin•The Handbook of Linguistics•2003

  • Consensus, Polarization, and Alignment in the Economics Profession

    Open Access•Tod Van Gunten, J Levi Martins et al.•Sociological Science•2016

  • Measuring Political Deliberation

    Open Access•Marco R Steenbergen, André Bächtiger et al.•Comparative European Politics•2003

  • Assessing Readability

    George R Klare•Reading Research Quarterly•1974

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae