Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Adjudication in the Rhetorical Context of Chinese Ideological Speech

Bibliographic Data

ID16860774
AuthorsSamuli Seppänen (0000-0001-6645-3895, Chinese University of Hong Kong, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume17
Issue2
Pages381-400
Publication date2025-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHague Journal on the Rule of Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1876-4045 • E-ISSN: 1876-4053
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s40803-025-00250-x
OpenAlexW4410742002
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited17

Does recent Chinese ideological speech on the rule of law add anything new to Chinese legal reasoning and adjudication? This article argues that the significance of Chinese ideological speech is easier to appreciate when it is studied as rhetoric rather than as legal theoretical arguments or as policy concepts. Recent texts on the Chinese Communist Party’s rule of law ideology are mostly based on preexisting concepts of Chinese legal thought. From a conceptual perspective, these efforts may appear to have little bearing on adjudication in Chinese people’s courts. From the rhetorical perspective, however, the influence of Party ideology on Chinese legal reasoning and adjudication can be seen to emerge from the overall rhetorical context of the Chinese party-state. The result of this influence may be best theorized as an implicit ideological sensibility, which supports the changing priorities of the Chinese party-state. Rhetorical theory also facilitates comparisons between Chinese ideological advocacy efforts and the promotion of policy concepts in other organizations. This article finds a point of comparison for Chinese ideological advocacy in the promotion of the Human Rights-based Approaches to Development within the United Nations system. This comparison casts light on the motivations and challenges of ideological advocacy in organizational settings

Adjudication · Ideology · International law · Linguistics · Political science · Public international law · Rhetorical question · History · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Ombudsman and Human Rights · Philosophy

  • To Argue in a ‘Socialist’ and Moral Way

    Open Access•Yang Qiu•Social & Legal Studies•2026

  • Political Thought of Xi Jinping

    Steve Tsang, Olivia Cheung•Political Thought of Xi Jinping•2024

  • Organizational rhetoric

    Open Access•Corey Jay Liberman•Journal of Communication•2011

  • Power and Principle

    Joel E Oestreich•Power and Principle•2007

  • Development as Freedom

    Open Access•Alan M Rugman, Amartya Sen•Rugman reviews international…•2009

  • Ships Passing in the Night

    Philip Alston•Human Rights Quarterly•2005

  • The Role of Law in the Transition of Societies

    Open Access•Yash Ghai•Journal of African Law•1991

  • Formalism and anti-formalism in the Chinese Communist Party’s governance project

    Open Access•Samuli Seppänen•Global Constitutionalism•2021

  • Pressures on Chinese Judges under Xi

    Xin He•The China Journal•2020

  • The political function of narrative in organizations

    Dennis K Mumby•Communication Monographs•1987

  • Foreign Policy Implications for China’s “Foreign-Related ‘Rule of Law’”

    Open Access•Matthew S Erie•Orbis•2023

  • The Transformation of State Socialist Rule of Law into Party-State Socialist Rule of Law in the Xi Jinping Era

    Open Access•Randall Peerenboom•Hague Journal on the Rule of Law•2025

  • Rhetoric of Motives

    Kenneth Burke•Rhetoric of Motives•1969

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae