A European (German) View on Comparative Theology
Dialogue with My Own Past
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16901725 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ulrich Dehn (Universität Hamburg, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1085-1093 |
| Publication date | 2012-11-14 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel3041085 |
| OpenAlex | W1968659632 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 7 |
For the last couple of years, particularly after the publication of the (German) book “Comparative Theology” by Bernhold Reinhardt and Klaus von Stosch, there was a significant attentiveness of this subject amongst German scholars. For many, it was the long anticipated antithesis/alternative to the pluralist theology of religions, even if it had not been devised explicitly to serve as such an alternative. For others, it has been an appropriate way to express their desire for a substantial interreligious dialogue in a theologically responsible way. This paper tries to review some of the major German contributions (being read alongside international ones) and reactions to Comparative Theology and to search for the motive behind its sudden popularity in some circles. It will also try to reconstruct the possibilities for Comparative Theology within the wider setting of the process and development of religious traditions as they grow and change in never-ending interaction and communication within the history of religions, ideas and society
Antithesis · Comparative religion · Comparative Theology · Epistemology · German · Linguistics · Political science · Popularity · Sociology · Theology · Anthropology · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Christian Theology and Mission · Computer Science · Law · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Religious studies
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |