Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Freedom of Conscience of Healthcare Professionals and Conscientious Objection in the European Court of Human Rights

Bibliographic Data

ID16901909
AuthorsMaría José Valero, María José Valero Estarellas (0000-0002-4869-4529, Universidad Villanueva, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume13
Issue6
Pages558
Publication date2022-06-16
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReligions (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/rel13060558
OpenAlexW4283030493
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited15

The recent social and legal debate in several European countries on abortion, euthanasia, and assisted suicide has caused a strong resurgence of the concerns of healthcare personnel as to the real possibility of protecting their consciences in their professional sphere. Individual refusal for religious, moral, deontological, or ethical reasons to participate in activities that directly or indirectly could result in the termination of a human life constitutes the most extreme manifestation of the legal phenomenon of conscientious objection. Although the European Convention on Human Rights does not recognize a general right to conscientious objection, since Bayatyan v. Armenia, the case law of the European Court of Human Rights has identified a connection between conscience-related claims to compulsory military service and Article 9 of the Convention. However, to this date, this doctrine has not been applied to cases that affect health-sensitive areas like abortion and contraception. This article analyzes the activity of the European Court of Human Rights in relation to the right to freedom of conscience and to conscientious objection, particularly in healthcare, and offers several final observations projected to possible future conflicts

Abortion · Conscience · Conscientious objector · Convention · Doctrine · Health care · Human rights · Political science · Spanish Civil War · Law · Legal Rights and Human Rights · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Torture, Ethics, and Law

  • From Institutional Neutrality to Professional Identity

    Open Access•Katarzyna Kowalik, Dagmara Kowalik et al.•Religions•2026

  • Religious Human Rights in Global Perspective

    John Witte, Johan D van der Vyver•Religious Human Rights in Global…•1996

  • The Conscience Wars

    Susanna Mancini, Michel Rosenfeld•Conscience Wars•2018

  • The Midwife’s Tale

    Open Access•Wojciech Brzozowski•Oxford Journal of Law and Religion•2022

  • Conscientious Objection through the Contrasting Lenses of Tolerance and Respect

    Open Access•Stijn Smet•Oxford Journal of Law and Religion•2019

  • Tolerating the Intolerant

    Open Access•Sandra Fredman•Oxford Journal of Law and Religion•2020

  • Conscientious Exemptions

    John Olusegun Adenitire, John Adenitire•Oxford Journal of Law and Religion•2017

  • Is Freedom of Conscience Superior to Freedom of Religion?

    Open Access•Rex Ahdar•Oxford Journal of Law and Religion•2018

  • Freedom of Religion and ‘Reasonable Accommodation’ in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights

    Ann Power-Forde•Oxford Journal of Law and Religion•2016

  • Connecting Reproductive Rights, Democracy, and the Rule of Law

    Open Access•Atina Krajewska•German Law Journal•2021

  • Relationship Between Covid-19, Euthanasia and Old Age

    Open Access•Juan Salinas•Journal of Religion and Health•2021

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae