Réfutation du livre The Betrayal of Anne Frank ( Qui a Trahi Anne Frank ?) de Rosemary Sullivan
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16903752 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bart van der Boom (0000-0002-1259-1069), Laurien Vastenhout (0000-0001-9615-8010, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum), Claire Darmon |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 216 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 335-358 |
| Publication date | 2022-09-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revue d’Histoire de la Shoah (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2111-885X • E-ISSN: 2553-6141 |
| Publisher | CAIRN (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3917/rhsho.216.0335 |
| OpenAlex | W4307370909 |
| Language | FR |
The publication on January 17, 2022 of a book entitled The Betrayal of Anne Frank by best-selling author Rosemary Sullivan, claiming to “understand what triggered the roundup of August 4, 1944,” during which the young diarist was arrested and deported, has caused a shockwave and controversy. The book’s thesis pointed to a “traitor,” Arnold van den Bergh, a Jewish notary, humanitarian activist, and member of the Jewish Council. Rigorous research by four specialists from the NIOD Institute for War, Holocaust, and Genocide Studies led to a report refuting this position point by point. This article presents the report’s central argument and conclusion and proposes an overview of the current media and memory-related debate
Art · Art history · Betrayal · Humanities · Judaism · Political science · The Holocaust · Theology · Law · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |