Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Making Up for Lost Nature? A Critical Review of the International Development of Voluntary Biodiversity Offsets

Bibliographic Data

ID16908343
AuthorsSarah Benabou (0000-0002-7075-4487, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume5
Issue1
Publication date2014-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironment and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2150-6779 • E-ISSN: 2150-6787
PublisherBerghahn Books (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3167/ares.2014.050107
OpenAlexW2333467496
LanguageEN
Citations received25
References cited15

This article analyzes the international development of voluntary biodiversity offsets, a conservation instrument that permits developers to pursue their activities if conservation actions are undertaken elsewhere to compensate for the environmental impacts of their projects. Largely undertaken by extractive industries that operate in the global South where no offsetting regulations exist, this tool is currently attracting growing interest from policy makers, private companies, financial institutions, and conservation experts. Building upon the concept of market framing developed by Callon (1998), I explore in what contexts and through what processes this idea has gathered momentum, as well as the disturbing gap between the way it has been framed and its practical implementation. It is suggested that once immersed in the outside world, the market framing of offsets appears as a fragile result dependent upon substantial investments, which casts serious doubts about offsets' ability to reduce biodiversity loss on technical, governance, and social grounds

Biodiversity · Biodiversity conservation · Business · Corporate governance · Economics · Environmental resource management · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Engineering · Environmental Conservation and Management · Ecology · Finance

  • Political ecology, variegated green economies, and the foreclosure of alternative sustainabilities

    Open Access•Connor Joseph Cavanagh, Tor A Benjaminsen•Journal of Political Ecology•2017

  • Neoliberal Conservation and the Corporate Governance of Biodiversity

    Open Access•Lucie Wiart•Journal of Business Ethics•2026

  • A faultline in neoliberal environmental governance scholarship? Or, why accumulation-by-alienation matters

    Open Access•Alexander Dunlap, Sullivan et al.•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2020

  • Mitigation of coral ecosystem service-related social issues

    Shingo Takeda, Tamotsu Murayama et al.•Impact Assessment and Project…•2021

  • Situating extraction in capitalism

    Open Access•Emma Lochery•The Extractive Industries and…•2022

  • The compensation arenas in south New Caledonia. Minescape, governmentality and politics

    Open Access•Claire Levacher, P Y Le Meur•The Extractive Industries and…•2021

  • Mining legacies––Broadening understandings of mining impacts

    Open Access•Markus Brueckner, Rochelle Spencer et al.•The Extractive Industries and…•2021

  • Historical Foundations of Green Developmental Policies

    Open Access•Ritwick Ghosh, Stephanie Barral et al.•Regulation & Governance•2024

  • Offset payments can reduce environmental impacts of urban development

    Open Access•Sean Pascoe, Toni Cannard et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2019

  • Carbon Forests at the Margins of the State

    Open Access•Sarah Benabou•Journal of South Asian Development•2021

  • Environmental offsetting

    Open Access•João Vaz, Jessica Coria et al.•Ecological Economics•2025

  • Environmental governance in motion

    Open Access•Peter R Wilshusen•World Development•2019

  • The politics of influence in biodiversity offsetting

    Open Access•Stephanie Barral, Ritwick Ghosh et al.•Nature Sustainability•2025

  • Re-mining the collections

    Open Access•Benjamin Neimark, Benjamin D Neimark et al.•Geoforum•2015

  • Prospects for integration of carbon and biodiversity credits

    Open Access•Jeremy Webb, Hidemichi Fujii et al.•Sustainability Science•2025

  • Valuing Species

    Open Access•Aurora Fredriksen•Valuation Studies•2017

  • No net loss of what, for whom

    Open Access•Oliver Taherzadeh, Peter Howley•Environment Development and…•2018

  • The Sweet and the Bitter

    Open Access•Cécile Bidaud, Kate Schreckenberg et al.•Conservation and Society•2017

  • The local costs of biodiversity offsets

    Open Access•Cécile Bidaud, Kate Schreckenberg et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Local people’s preferences for housing development-associated Biodiversity Net Gain in England

    Open Access•Amber Butler, Ben Groom et al.•Land Use Policy•2025

  • Achieving biodiversity benefits with offsets

    Open Access•Stefan Gelcich, Camila Vargas et al.•AMBIO•2017

  • The Metrics of Making Ecosystem Services

    Open Access•Pamela Mcelwee•Environment and Society•2017

  • Why there and then, not here and now? Ecological offsetting in California and England, and the sharpening contradictions of neoliberal natures

    Open Access•Adrienne Lockhart, Christopher M Rea et al.•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2019

  • From conservation to offsetting and neoliberalization

    Open Access•Bertrand Prévost, Audrey Rivaud•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2019

  • Securing accumulation by restoration - Exploring spectacular corporate conservation, coal mining and biodiversity compensation in the German Rhineland

    Open Access•Andrea Brock•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2023

  • Inverting the impacts

    Caroline Seagle•Green Grabbing•2018

  • Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes

    Open Access•Fabien Quétier, Sandra Lavorel•Biological Conservation•2011

  • Frame analysis

    Erving Goffman, José Luis Rodríguez•Frame Analysis•1986

  • Biodiversity tradeoffs and offsets in impact assessment and decision making

    Susie Brownlie, Nicholas King et al.•Impact Assessment and Project…•2013

  • No Net Loss

    Open Access•Morgan M Robertson, Morgan Robertson•Antipode•2000

  • The Devil is in the (Bio)diversity

    Open Access•K I Macdonald•Antipode•2010

  • The neoliberalization of ecosystem services

    Open Access•Morgan M Robertson, Morgan Robertson•Geoforum•2004

  • Biodiversity loss as material risk

    Open Access•Jason Dempsey, Jessica Dempsey•Geoforum•2012

  • Measurement and alienation

    Open Access•Morgan Robertson•Transactions of the Institute of…•2011

  • Teeb Begins Now

    Open Access•K I Macdonald, Catherine Corson•Development and Change•2012

  • Towards a Synthesized Critique of Neoliberal Biodiversity Conservation

    Bram Büscher, Sullivan et al.•Capitalism Nature Socialism•2012

  • The Contradictory Logic of Global Ecosystem Services Markets

    Open Access•Kathleen Mcafee•Development and Change•2012

  • Green Grabbing

    Open Access•James Fairhead, Macedward Leach et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2012

  • Inverting the impacts

    Caroline Seagle•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2012

Unique citing works25
Citations per year2,27
Citation span2015 - 2026 (12)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 24

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae