Making Up for Lost Nature? A Critical Review of the International Development of Voluntary Biodiversity Offsets
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16908343 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sarah Benabou (0000-0002-7075-4487, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environment and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2150-6779 • E-ISSN: 2150-6787 |
| Publisher | Berghahn Books (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3167/ares.2014.050107 |
| OpenAlex | W2333467496 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 25 |
| References cited | 15 |
This article analyzes the international development of voluntary biodiversity offsets, a conservation instrument that permits developers to pursue their activities if conservation actions are undertaken elsewhere to compensate for the environmental impacts of their projects. Largely undertaken by extractive industries that operate in the global South where no offsetting regulations exist, this tool is currently attracting growing interest from policy makers, private companies, financial institutions, and conservation experts. Building upon the concept of market framing developed by Callon (1998), I explore in what contexts and through what processes this idea has gathered momentum, as well as the disturbing gap between the way it has been framed and its practical implementation. It is suggested that once immersed in the outside world, the market framing of offsets appears as a fragile result dependent upon substantial investments, which casts serious doubts about offsets' ability to reduce biodiversity loss on technical, governance, and social grounds
Biodiversity · Biodiversity conservation · Business · Corporate governance · Economics · Environmental resource management · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Engineering · Environmental Conservation and Management · Ecology · Finance
Political ecology, variegated green economies, and the foreclosure of alternative sustainabilities
Neoliberal Conservation and the Corporate Governance of Biodiversity
A faultline in neoliberal environmental governance scholarship? Or, why accumulation-by-alienation matters
Mitigation of coral ecosystem service-related social issues
Situating extraction in capitalism
The compensation arenas in south New Caledonia. Minescape, governmentality and politics
Mining legacies––Broadening understandings of mining impacts
Historical Foundations of Green Developmental Policies
Offset payments can reduce environmental impacts of urban development
Carbon Forests at the Margins of the State
Environmental offsetting
Environmental governance in motion
The politics of influence in biodiversity offsetting
Re-mining the collections
Prospects for integration of carbon and biodiversity credits
Valuing Species
No net loss of what, for whom
The Sweet and the Bitter
The local costs of biodiversity offsets
Local people’s preferences for housing development-associated Biodiversity Net Gain in England
Achieving biodiversity benefits with offsets
The Metrics of Making Ecosystem Services
Why there and then, not here and now? Ecological offsetting in California and England, and the sharpening contradictions of neoliberal natures
From conservation to offsetting and neoliberalization
Securing accumulation by restoration - Exploring spectacular corporate conservation, coal mining and biodiversity compensation in the German Rhineland
Inverting the impacts
Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes
Frame analysis
Biodiversity tradeoffs and offsets in impact assessment and decision making
No Net Loss
The Devil is in the (Bio)diversity
The neoliberalization of ecosystem services
Biodiversity loss as material risk
Measurement and alienation
Teeb Begins Now
Towards a Synthesized Critique of Neoliberal Biodiversity Conservation
The Contradictory Logic of Global Ecosystem Services Markets
Green Grabbing
Inverting the impacts
| Unique citing works | 25 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,27 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 24 |