Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Focus and Interaction in Writing Conferences for EFL Writers

Bibliographic Data

ID16911447
AuthorsLuxin Yang (0000-0002-2961-9937, Beijing Foreign Studies University, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume12
Issue1
Publication date2022-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSAGE Open (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/21582440211058200
OpenAlexW4211088682
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited26

It is widely recognized that writing conferences benefit second or foreign language writers for the immediacy and the potential to address their needs and provide tailored and individualized support. However, limited attention has been given to the foci and interaction between teacher and student in writing conferences longitudinally. To address this need, this study examined writing conferences between five university English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) students and their instructor in an argumentative writing course over one semester in a key Chinese university. Multiple sources of data were collected, including conferences, students’ essay drafts and written reflections, and interviews with the students and the instructor. Data analyses show that the conferences covered a large variety of topics such as varied aspects about argumentative writing, learning habits, and expectations about the course, which were related to English proficiency and English writing ability of each student. Second, the instructor took different approaches to communicate with each student in writing conferences considering their difficulties and needs. Finally, the conferences contribute to a deliberative process critical to the process of learning to write argumentation. The students found conversations with the instructor helpful in their subsequent revisions whereas the instructor gained a better understanding of students’ difficulties in writing. This study suggests that more research is needed to examine the role of conferences in EFL writing instruction. This study supports that conferences, as an important aid, will facilitate EFL students in the process of learning to write in English in addition to teacher written feedback and peer review

Academic writing · Argumentation theory · Argumentative · Immediacy · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Professional writing · Second language · Second language writing · Writing process · Computer Science · Educational and Psychological Assessments · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Psychology · Student Assessment and Feedback

  • Revisiting writing feedback

    Open Access•Kumneger Chenekew Goshu, Hailay Tesfay Gebremariam•Ampersand•2024

  • Measuring engagement in technology-supported collaborative argumentative writing

    Open Access•Li-Jen Wang, Ying‐Tien Wu et al.•Assessing Writing•2026

  • Honing writing acuity

    Open Access•Kumneger Chenekew Goshu, Hailay Tesfay Gebremariam et al.•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2025

  • Sociocultural Theory and the Pedagogical Imperative in L2 Education

    James P Lantolf, Matthew E Poehner et al.•Sociocultural Theory and the…•2014

  • Negative Feedback as Regulation and Second Language Learning in the Zone of Proximal Development

    Open Access•ALI ALJAAFREH, Matthew E Poehner et al.•Modern Language Journal•1994

  • Learning as Changing Participation

    Open Access•Richard F Young, Elizabeth R Miller•Modern Language Journal•2004

  • The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing

    Open Access•John Bitchener, Stuart Young et al.•Journal of Second Language Writing•2005

  • The Joint Construction of Meaning in Writing Conferences

    Mari Haneda•Applied Linguistics•2004

  • Investigating L2 writing through tutor-tutee interactions and revisions

    Open Access•Lu Yu•Journal of Second Language Writing•2020

  • Teachers' Choice and Learners' Preference of Corrective Feedback Types

    Reiko Yoshida•Language Awareness•2008

  • Writing Conferences and the Weaving of Multi-Voiced Texts in College Composition

    G Genevieve Patthey‐chavez, G G Patthey-Chavez et al.•Research in the Teaching of English•1997

  • Teaching ESL Composition

    Philip A Douglas, Dana R Ferris et al.•TESOL Quarterly•2001

  • Responding to Student Writing

    Vivian Zamel•TESOL Quarterly•1985

  • Student Input and Negotiation of Meaning in ESL Writing Conferences

    Lynn M Goldstein, Susan Conrad et al.•TESOL Quarterly•1990

  • When Are They Going to Say “It” Right? Understanding Learner Talk During Pair‐Work Activity

    Open Access•Frank B Brooks, Richard Donato et al.•Foreign Language Annals•1997

  • Qualitative inquiry and research design

    John W Creswell•Qualitative inquiry and research…•2013

  • Qualitative Data Analysis

    Open Access•Matthew B Miles, A Michael Huberman•Journal of Environmental Psychology•1994

Citations per year1.5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae