Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Examining the Interaction Effects Among Multiple Terminals in an Online Q&A Community

Substitution or Synergy

Bibliographic Data

ID16911468
AuthorsZhiliang Ying (0000-0001-6228-5433, Sichuan University), Li Jia (0000-0001-6532-4063, Sichuan University), Liang Zhou (0000-0003-4374-2242, North China Institute of Science and Technology, corresponding author), Zhou Liang (0000-0001-9093-2300), Zhou Sijia (0009-0008-5163-6398, Sichuan University)
Year2025
Volume15
Issue3
Publication date2025-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSAGE Open (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/21582440251367124
OpenAlexW4414044863
LanguageEN
References cited57

The rapid proliferation of multiple terminals in online communities has significantly transformed user behavior, making the effective management of these terminals crucial for user acquisition, retention, activation, and conversion. Despite the growing importance of multi-terminal environments, existing research has largely overlooked the interaction effects among terminals. To address this gap, this study investigates how multiple terminals interact in an online channel, specifically focusing on user transfer behavior between PC terminals and mobile terminals in an online Question-and-Answer (Q&A) community. Grounded in brand extension and expectation confirmation theories, we propose a theoretical model to examine the interaction effects among multiple terminals in Zhihu, a representative online Q&A community in China. We use SEM to analyze the data. Findings indicate that both substitution and synergy effects exist among multiple terminals, with the synergy effect being significantly stronger than the substitution effect. Furthermore, the results reveal that perceived quality, perceptual fit, expectation confirmation, and relative advantages affect the interaction among multiple terminals. Specifically, perceived quality and perceptual fit play significant roles in generating the synergy effect, while expectation confirmation and relative advantages drive the substitution effect. This study proposes a comprehensive framework for understanding multi-terminal interactions. The model holds both theoretical and practical relevance, as it helps in understanding user behavior in multiple terminal environments and provides implications for the design of multiple terminal strategies

Interaction · Perception · Social relation · Substitution effect · Digital Marketing and Social Media · Expert finding and Q&A systems · Knowledge Management and Sharing

  • From Multi-Channel Retailing to Omni-Channel Retailing

    Open Access•Peter C Verhoef, P K Kannan et al.•Journal of Retailing•2015

  • Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions

    Open Access•David A Aaker, Kevin Lane Keller•Journal of Marketing•1990

  • Examining the role of trust and quality dimensions in the actual usage of mobile banking services

    Open Access•Sujeet Kumar Sharma, Manisha Sharma•International Journal of…•2019

  • Models of Consumer Satisfaction Formation

    David K Tse, Peter C Wilton•Journal of Marketing Research•1988

  • Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

    Claes Fornell, David F Larcker•Journal of Marketing Research•1981

  • Understanding Customer Experience Throughout the Customer Journey

    Open Access•Katherine N Lemon, Peter C Verhoef•Journal of Marketing•2016

  • Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments

    Open Access•J Joseph Cronin, Michael K Brady et al.•Journal of Retailing•2000

  • Estimating and Comparing Specific Mediation Effects in Complex Latent Variable Models

    Open Access•Rebecca S Lau, Gordon W Cheung•Organizational Research Methods•2012

  • A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions

    Richard L Oliver•Journal of Marketing Research•1980

  • Understanding Information Systems Continuance

    Anol Bhattacherjee•MIS Quarterly•2001

  • Common method biases in behavioral research

    Philip M Podsakoff, Scott B Mackenzie et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2003

  • Understanding the self-perceived customer experience and repurchase intention in live streaming shopping

    Open Access•Minqin Yi, Ming Chen et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Factors influencing continuance intention to use mobile banking

    Open Access•Gia Doi Nguyen, Thu-Hien Thi Dao•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • From knowledge seeking to knowledge contribution

    Open Access•Nan Wang, Liya Wang et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2022

  • Exploring oppositional loyalty and satisfaction in firm-hosted communities in China

    Open Access•Ruo-Yu Liang, Wei Guo et al.•Internet Research•2019

  • Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling

    Open Access•Nassim Tabri, Craig M Elliott•Canadian Graduate Journal of…•2012

  • Modeling Blog Usage From a Developing Country Perspective Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)

    Open Access•Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani, Ramayah Thurasamy et al.•SAGE Open•2020

  • Disentangling the Web of Marginalization

    Open Access•Michael Bruun Andersen•SAGE Open•2024

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae