Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Treatment Adherence and Cognitive Emotion Regulation Skills in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Bibliographic Data

ID16913485
AuthorsGizem Beycan Ekitli (0000-0002-7308-5629), Özkan Uğuz (0000-0002-9410-9511), Emel Öztürk Turgut (0000-0003-0620-2749), Olcay Çam (0000-0002-6115-7306)
Year2025
Volume15
Issue3
Publication date2025-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSAGE Open (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/21582440251363675
LanguageEN
References cited49

The study determined the level of treatment adherence motivation in outpatients with diabetes mellitus and examine the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation skills and treatment adherence motivation. This descriptive, correlational study included 458 diabetes mellitus outpatients. Data were collected via an online survey comprising a Patient Information Form, the Turkish Modified Morisky Scale, which assesses treatment adherence through motivation and adherence related knowledge subscales, and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, which measures adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies. Analyses included correlations and binary logistic regressions. Participants had a mean age of 51.02 years; 50.4% were women, and 58.7% had type 2 diabetes mellitus. Over half exhibited low motivation for treatment adherence. Motivation was negatively associated with maladaptive strategies such as other-blame (rho = −.181, p p B = 0.14), catastrophizing ( B = −0.12), planning ( B = −0.12), and education level ( B = −0.30; p B = −0.025) and education ( B = −0.433), but not by emotion regulation strategies. Over half of the participants of diabetes mellitus exhibited low treatment adherence. Low treatment motivation is common among diabetes mellitus outpatients and is influenced by both emotion regulation and sociodemographic factors. While knowledge alone is insufficient, emotion regulation strategies—especially maladaptive ones—play a critical role. Interventions that combine psychoeducation with emotion-focused approaches may enhance adherence in chronic illness care

  • A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena

    Open Access•Mary Ellen Wewers, Nancy K Lowe•Research in Nursing & Health•1990

  • A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain

    Open Access•Nikos Ntoumanis, Johan Y Y Ng et al.•Health Psychology Review•2021

  • Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms

    Open Access•Nadia Garnefski, Jan Teerds et al.•Personality and Individual…•2004

  • Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems

    Open Access•Nadia Garnefski, Vivian Kraaij et al.•Personality and Individual…•2001

  • Emotion Regulation in Everyday Life.

    James J Gro, James J Gross et al.•Emotion regulation in couples and…•2006

  • The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire

    Nadia Garnefski, Vivian Kraaij•European Journal of Psychological…•2007

  • Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being

    Richard M Ryan, Edward L Deci•American Psychologist•2000

  • Optimizing stress

    Open Access•Alia J Crum, Jeremy P Jamieson et al.•Emotion•2020

  • Concurrent and Predictive Validity of a Self-reported Measure of Medication Adherence

    Donald E Morisky, Lawrence W Green et al.•Medical Care•1986

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae