Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Study Protocol and Baseline Comparisons for a Pan-Canadian Initiative to Reduce Inappropriate Use of Antipsychotics in Long-Term Care Homes

Bibliographic Data

ID16914340
AuthorsJohn P Hirdes (0000-0001-9619-6543, University of Waterloo, corresponding author), Jennifer Major (0000-0003-3140-5046, Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement), Selma Didic (Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement), Christine Quinn (0009-0002-5143-6026, Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement), Cynthia Sinclair, Jennifer Bucek (Canadian Institute for Health Information), Stephen Samis (Yukon Health and Social Services), Micaela Jantzi (0000-0003-0048-3244, University of Waterloo), Jonathan Chen (0000-0003-4907-0061), Jonathan H Chen (0000-0002-4387-8740, University of Waterloo), Nancy Curtin-Telegdi, Kaye Phillips (Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement)
Year2019
Volume9
Issue1
Publication date2019-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSAGE Open (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/2158244019835942
OpenAlexW2921865966
LanguageEN
References cited11

Antipsychotic use in the absence of symptoms or diagnoses related to psychosis is generally regarded as an inappropriate approach to care of older adults in nursing homes. The Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement (CFHI) launched a pan-Canadian intervention study to reduce antipsychotic use in long-term care based on promising pilot study results from the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority (WRHA). Data from the Continuing Care Report System (CCRS) managed by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) were used to compare the characteristics of residents in intervention homes with control homes not in the study. The sample was comprised of 5,434 residents in 49 intervention homes compared with 123,781 residents in 1,193 control homes. Resident-level comparisons included demographic, diagnostic, and clinical indicators. Facility-level comparisons included nine risk-adjusted quality indicators. The main differences of note were in geographic representation (Ontario homes were underrepresented), access to rehabilitation, and discharge patterns (both of which were related to Ontario practice patterns). There were few substantial differences in quality indicator performance between homes by study participation prior to the onset of the intervention. The study protocol used in this pan-Canadian intervention was based on a successful, small-scale pilot undertaken in one province. Sites that participated in the intervention did not differ in substantively meaningful ways from control homes. Therefore, subsequent study findings after the intervention are unlikely to be attributable to differences between homes that existed prior to the study onset

Family medicine · Health care · Long-term care · Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Health disparities and outcomes · Medicine · Nursing · Gerontology

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae