Why Did You Not Act on Our Suggestion? Regulatory and Growth-Oriented Opportunities During Ethical Review
A Case Study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16914367 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sean G Dicks (0000-0002-3354-3760, University of Canberra, corresponding author), Ian J Pieper (0000-0003-4838-224X, Act Health), Holly Northam (0000-0002-4690-3999, University of Canberra), Holly L Northam, Frank M P van Haren, Frank van Haren (0000-0001-8037-4229, Australian National University), Douglas P Boer (University of Canberra) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2020-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | SAGE Open (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/2158244020920587 |
| OpenAlex | W3025478927 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 49 |
In Australia, before conducting research with human participants, researchers must have their research plan reviewed by a Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) to ensure that proposed methods meet ethical requirements and protect the welfare of participants. In addition, it has been proposed that HRECs can contribute to a novice researcher’s ethical mindfulness. To explore this suggestion, the current self-reflective case study examines the dialogue between a PhD candidate and the HREC that reviewed his proposed study of family bereavement in the context of the potential for organ donation. Findings suggest that when a respectful, problem-solving attitude is adopted by both parties, a learning environment evolves where diverse views, differences of opinion, and novel solutions are tolerated. In this context, the research plan is improved and the novice researcher’s ability to apply research ethics is developed. Simultaneously, members of the HREC gain practice in the identification of ethical dilemmas and the application of ethical principles that help resolve those dilemmas
Engineering ethics · Ethical issues · Human research · Mindfulness · Psychotherapist · Research ethics · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Organ Donation and Transplantation · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Psychology
What Makes Clinical Research Ethical?
Human-centred design in global health
Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects
Encyclopedia of Case Study Research
Researching feedback dialogue
Not seeing the wood for the trees
Making ethics review a learning institution
Making sense of the meaning literature
Ethical Evaluation of Mental Health Social Research
Community Partnered Research Ethics Training in Practice
Walking along beside the Researcher”
Post-Mortem Organ Donation and Grief
Parental Grief Following the Brain Death of a Child
Guidelines for conducting ethical bereavement research
Keeping Her Whole
The Power of Feedback
Making sense of the sensemaking perspective
Bereaved parents' experience of research participation
A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy
Ethics, Reflexivity, and "Ethically Important Moments" in Research
| Highly cited | No |
|---|