Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Review on Green Technology Practices at BRICS Countries

Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa

Bibliographic Data

ID16915040
AuthorsIsabella Tamine Parra Miranda (0000-0001-9534-8082, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, corresponding author), Juliana Moletta (0000-0002-2763-8982, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná), Bruno Pedroso (0000-0002-7905-2393, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa), Luiz Alberto Pilatti (0000-0003-2679-9191, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná), Claudia Tania Picinin (0000-0003-4844-3516, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná)
Year2021
Volume11
Issue2
Publication date2021-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSAGE Open (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/21582440211013780
OpenAlexW3165424816
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited144

The objective of this study is to identify the main Green Technology practices carried out in the countries Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS), through a systematic review without temporal delimitation. BRICS countries were chosen due to the high potential for impact on the environment, as well as the possibility of increasing the theoretical subsidy in discussions related to sustainable practices in these countries. The Methodi Ordinatio methodology was used to select and map the portfolio of relevant articles in the area, which allowed the identification of the main Green Technology practices used in the BRICS countries. The final portfolio was composed of 170 studies. The main Green Technology practices used in the BRICS are related to products, processes, and raw materials; a sustainable agriculture; water treatment and retention; waste management; green energy and energy reduction; carbon and biogas reduction; green buildings; and sustainability and ecocities policies. A greater number of researches on Green Technology and its practices took place in the countries of China and India, which can be explained due to its more sustainable development, greater number of sustainable actions, and growing interest by the country’s local academy. Brazil, Russia, and South Africa did not excel in Green Technology practices. The study provided an overview of the practices used in these countries and that can contribute to guidance for companies that are concerned with sustainability. It is worth mentioning that the political interest in this topic was identified, because there are political actions that encourage Green Technology practices

Agriculture · Business · China · Economic growth · Economics · General partnership · Geography · Natural resource economics · Political science · Portfolio · Sustainability · Sustainable development · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Sustainable Building Design and Assessment · Sustainable Supply Chain Management

  • Spatial effects of green innovation and carbon emission reduction in China

    Open Access•Qiufeng Zhang, Junfeng Li et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2024

  • Distance with Customers Effects on Green Product Innovation in SMEs

    Open Access•Mei Han, Bilin Xu•SAGE Open•2021

  • Forecasting of Industrial Output and Greenhouse Gas Emission

    Open Access•Ramesh Chandra Das, Enrico Ivaldi•Social Indicators Research•2026

  • The Challenges of Technology Transfer in the Industry 4.0 Era Regarding Anthropotechnological Aspects

    Open Access•Fanny Kovaleski, Claudia Tania Picinin et al.•SAGE Open•2022

  • Syllable-Based Generalizations in English Phonology

    Daniel Kahn•Syllable-Based Generalizations in…•2015

  • Eco-innovation

    Open Access•Cristina Díaz-García, Ángela González Moreno et al.•The Innovation•2015

  • How do environmental technologies affect green growth? Evidence from BRICS economies

    Open Access•Danish Danish, Recep Ulucak et al.•The Science of The Total…•2020

  • The impacts of economic growth, trade openness and technological progress on renewable energy use in organization for economic co-operation and development countries

    Open Access•Mahmudul Alam, Md Mahmudul Alam et al.•Renewable Energy•2020

  • Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China

    Open Access•Chuanguo Zhang, Xiangxue Zhou•Renewable and Sustainable Energy…•2016

  • A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes

    Open Access•Nancy Bocken, N M P Bocken et al.•Journal of Cleaner Production•2014

  • Business incubators and green technology

    Open Access•Maruschka Gonsalves, Jayne M Rogerson•Urbani izziv•2019

  • An Empirical Study of the Impact of the Air Transportation Industry Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction Projects on the Local Economy in China

    Open Access•Yuxiu Chen, Jian Yu et al.•International Journal of…•2018

  • Environmental Regulation, Foreign Direct Investment and Green Technological Progress—Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Industries

    Open Access•Jiangfeng Hu, Zhao Wang et al.•International Journal of…•2018

  • China's Eco-Cities as Variegated 1 Urban Sustainability

    I-Chun Catherine Chang, Elaine Sheppard•Journal of Urban Technology•2013

  • The Eco-City as Urban Technology

    Sandra Jo, Arthur P Molella•Journal of Urban Technology•2013

  • Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics

    Open Access•Klaus Rennings•Ecological Economics•2000

  • A green development model

    Tyler Harlan•Area Development and Policy•2017

  • Green Economy”

    Open Access•Mihail Nikolaevich Dudin, Sergey Kalendzhyan et al.•Economic Policy•2017

  • Overcoming the barriers for the development of green building certification in China

    Open Access•Jiaying Teng, Wei Zhang et al.•Journal of Housing and the Built…•2015

  • How do Public Demonstration Projects Promote Green‐Manufacturing Technologies? A Case Study from China

    Open Access•Yuan Zhou, Zhou Yuan et al.•Sustainable Development•2015

  • Comparing Solar Water Heater Popularization Policies in China, Israel and Australia

    Open Access•Wei Li, Tzameret H Rubin et al.•Sustainable Development•2012

  • Climate Change Policy of India

    Open Access•Rajnish Saryal•South Asia Research•2018

  • Paradigm shift toward sustainable commercial project development in China

    Xiaoling Zhang, Zhang xiaoling•Habitat International•2014

  • Delivering a low-carbon community in China

    Open Access•Xiaoling Zhang, Zhang xiaoling et al.•Habitat International•2013

  • Addressing Nuclear in the Africa–European Union Energy Partnership

    Oluwole Olutola•Politikon•2018

  • Trajectories for Greening in China

    Open Access•Peter Ho•Development and Change•2006

  • Transforming natural resources into industrial advantage

    Open Access•Carlos Aguiar De Medeiros, Nicholas M Trebat et al.•Brazilian Journal of Political…•2017

  • La Chine, principale bénéficiaire du mécanisme pour un développement propre (MDP)

    Pauline Lacour•Mondes en développement•2018

  • Beyond toilets and targets

    Avanish Kumar•Development in Practice•2017

  • Recursos hídricos no futuro

    Open Access•José Galizia Tundisi•Estudos Avançados•2008

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0.8
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae