From investment to net benefits
A review of guidelines and methodologies for cost–benefit analysis in the electricity sector
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16929436 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jose Angel Leiva Vilaplana (0000-0003-2595-5682, Center for Clinical & Basic Research, corresponding author), Guangya Yang (0000-0001-5799-1958, Technical University of Denmark), Emmanuel Ackom (0000-0002-9006-3501, University of North Alabama) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 124 |
| Pages | 104052 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Energy Research & Social Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2214-6296 • E-ISSN: 2214-6326 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.erss.2025.104052 |
| OpenAlex | W4409158386 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 79 |
The electricity sector is transforming to integrate renewable energy sources while ensuring grid quality, efficiency, and reliability. Such a transformation demands major investments from both private and public stakeholders. Economic appraisal tools such as cost–benefit analysis (CBA) have become increasingly relevant in identifying investments that optimize financial and social net benefits. Despite this, many CBA applications in the electricity sector, such as those for transmission and distribution infrastructure, tend to prioritize financial metrics and single-criterion evaluations, often neglecting broader social and environmental considerations. This highlights the need for a more inclusive approach to addressing these limitations. To this end, this paper provides a comprehensive review of the literature on CBA as applied to electricity infrastructure appraisals. First, the review examines various facets of CBA methodology, including its key steps, scope, standing, metrics, models, and approaches for addressing uncertainty. Second, this study analyzes relevant CBA guidelines employed to assess electricity projects’ social costs and benefits across the entire value chain, encompassing power generation, transmission, distribution, and end-use. Third, the paper highlights challenges and barriers within CBA guidelines, noting significant variations in their development and applicability across electricity domains and regions. The review categorizes these barriers into CBA into methodological, regulatory, and domain-specific barriers. Advancing CBA requires standardizing scope, unveiling cost and benefit causal chains, enhancing uncertainty handling, and leveraging synergies across regions to bridge gaps between theory and practice. • Review of cost-benefit analysis (CBA) for electricity infrastructure projects. • CBA guidelines vary in modeling tools, sophistication, and uncertainty handling. • Cross-domain insights enhance CBA theory and practice. • CBA faces methodological, regulatory, and domain-specific barriers. • Solutions: systemic view, dynamic modeling, transparency, and probabilistic methods
Business · Cost–benefit analysis · Economics · Electricity · Environmental economics · Industrial organization · Natural resource economics · Electric Power System Optimization · Engineering · Integrated Energy Systems Optimization · Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities
The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation
Conceptualizing energy security
Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2
Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies
A novel probabilistic regression model for electrical peak demand estimate of commercial and manufacturing buildings
Shedding light on the economic costs of long-duration power outages
Revaluing the costs and benefits of energy efficiency
A Partial Review of Seven Official Guidelines for Cost-Benefit Analysis
How to integrate users into smart charging – A critical and systematic review
The hidden costs of energy and mobility
The politics and economics of cross-border electricity infrastructure
Some Pitfalls of Practical Benefit-Cost Analysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis and European Union Cohesion Policy
The Cost-Benefit Fallacy
Constructing Viking Link
Standing in Cost‐Benefit Analysis
Applied Welfare Economics
Bridging the gap between LCA, LCC and CBA as sustainability assessment tools
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |