Symbolic wins as stepping stones toward material gains
Lessons from Sweden’s fossil fuel production ban
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16929477 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lukas Slothuus (0000-0002-6773-2244, University of Sussex, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Pages | 101929 |
| Publication date | 2026-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Extractive Industries and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2214-790X • E-ISSN: 2214-7918 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.exis.2026.101929 |
| OpenAlex | W7151764089 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 22 |
Sweden successfully implemented a ban on fossil fuel exploration and extraction. • The ban was driven by a combination of symbolic, material, and international motivations. • Proponents conceived of the ban as a stepping stone on the path to more ambitious climate and energy policy. How and why do some countries without ongoing fossil fuel exploration and extraction decide to unilaterally ban such activities? As part of a global momentum toward focusing on the supply-side of fossil fuels, Sweden implemented a fossil fuel production ban in 2022 despite being a non-producing state. Utilising a fossil fuel systems power analysis framework and drawing on data from 17 elite interviews with key stakeholders, I analyse the political dynamics of Sweden’s ban. I focus on the how and why , showing that the ban succeeded due to the efforts of a key pro-climate driver expending significant political capital, the lack of organised pro-fossil fuel incumbent resistance, and a pre-established path to prohibition from a prior uranium mining ban. Although disagreeing on the merits of each, the proponents and opponents agreed on the three key terrains of debate: the ban’s direct symbolic value, indirect material consequences, and global implications. I argue that the Swedish ban constitutes a stepping stone toward more ambitious climate and energy policy and combines both symbolic, material, and international dimensions. To be successful, proponents of fossil fuel production bans in other countries should therefore develop strategies to bolster the strength and counter the opposition along all three of these dimensions
Climate change · Elite · Energy policy · Environmental impact of the energy industry · Fossil fuel · Opposition (politics · Politics · Production (economics · Resource curse · Mining and Resource Management · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Cutting with both arms of the scissors
Anti-fossil fuel norms
Towards a fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty
Facing a fossil free future through the past
Regime resistance and accommodation
Abandoning fossil fuel production
Supply‐side climate policy
What next for supply-side policy in the south
Power in Fossil Fuel Supply-Side Policy
Trasformismo or transformation? The global political economy of energy transitions
Amplifying “Keep It in the Ground” First-Movers
Friends of the Earth as a policy entrepreneur
The political economy of supply-side climate policy in the UK
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |