Blurred Lines. History, Memory and the Experience of Time
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16929520 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Chris Lorenz (0000-0003-2121-9063, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 43 |
| Publication date | 2014-11-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal for History Culture and Modernity (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2214-9910 • E-ISSN: 2213-0624 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.18352/hcm.462 |
| OpenAlex | W2105816512 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 18 |
This article argues that fundamental controversial parts of the past – that since 1990 have been labeled as “catastrophic”, “post-traumatic”, “terroristic” and “haunting” – are overstretching the normal “historical” concept of “the past”. This is the case because historians normally presuppose that the past does "go away" - and therefore is distant and absent from the present. Thepresupposition that the “hot” present transforms into a “cold” past by itself, just like normal fires extinguish and “cool off” by themselves, has been constitutive for history as a discipline. This process of “cooling off” is often conceived of as the change from memory to history. The first part of this article connectsthe rise of history as the discipline studying “the past” to the invention of the “modern” future in the late eighteenth century and to the introduction of a linear and progressive notion of time. Next, the rise of memory as the central notion for understanding the past will be connected to the implosion of the future and of progressive linear time at the end of the twentieth century. This implosion was predominantly caused by the growing consciousness since the late 1980’s of the catastrophic character of the twentieth century. The second part argues that present definitions of the relationship between history and memory have typically remained ambiguous. This ambiguity is explained by the problematic distinction between the past and the present. Historians have been rather reluctant in recognising the fact that this fuzzy distinction represents a problem for the idea of history as a discipline as such
Ambiguity · Character (mathematics · Consciousness · Epistemology · Historicity (philosophy · Implosion · Linguistics · Politics · Temporality · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Balkans: History, Politics, Society · History · Law · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration · Philosophy
O que resta da Comissão Nacional da Verdade
Beyond romance
‘We’re equal to the Jews who were destroyed. [. . .] Compensate us, too’. An affective (un)remembering of Germany’s colonial past
The chronopolitics of national populism
The end into the beginning
The American Past in the Age of Fracture
Sobre os limites do tempo
Continuous Pasts , Arrested Futures
Israel Charny’s Attack on the Journal of Genocide Research and its Authors
Routledge International Handbook of Memory Studies
Experimentation and the future(s) of political hope
The politics of time, the politics of history
Engaging transitional justice in Australian history curriculum
How the past becomes the past
Lost in Time
Between the Unbearable Weight and Lightness of the Past. Banal Silence in Spain’s Post-Dictatorship Memory Politics
The temporality of memory politics
Représentations et pratiques sociales autour du temps chez les descendants des Marrons du Surinam de la vallée du Maroni en Guyane française
| Unique citing works | 18 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,8 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2025 (10) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 18 |