Bakhtin e Possenti em diálogo
Caminhos para a compreensão do fenômeno do riso/humor na contemporaneidade
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16939351 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Beatriz Amorim de Azevedo e Silva (0000-0001-9472-3434, Universidade de São Paulo, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 245-267 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-14 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Linha D'Água (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0103-3638 • E-ISSN: 2236-4242 |
| Publisher | Universidade de São Paulo. Agência de Bibliotecas e Coleções Digitais (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.11606/issn.2236-4242.v37i1p245-267 |
| OpenAlex | W4392861648 |
| Language | PT |
| References cited | 1 |
Drawing from Mikhail Bakhtin’s main texts on laughter (2010[1965]; 2013[1963]; 2017[1970-1971]; 2019[1965]), this article aims to answer two questions: (i) how can we assert the existence of a connection between the laughter set in the context of medieval popular and comic culture and the contemporary laughter? and (ii) how can we locate, describe, and analyze laughter in discursive terms in a corpus? To this end, the Bakhtinian theory is confronted with texts by Sírio Possenti on humor (1991; 2003; 2007; 2018), which generates a dialogical (re)reading that traces bridges between the Bakhtinian reflections on laughter at its maximum historical scope and the various forms of contemporary humor, as characterized by Possenti. Through this theoretical intersection, a way of understanding humor is proposed as a discursive phenomenon, as well as the disposition of its contemporary manifestations: the distinction between typically humoristic utterances/genres and carnivalized utterances/genres. Lastly, this reflection raises potential research problems to be explored by future analyzes of contemporary humoristic corpora
Art · Comics · Context (archaeology) · Dialogical self · Epistemology · Humanities · Humor research · Laughter · Linguistics · Literature · Phenomenon · Reading (process) · Sociology · Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies · History · Linguistics and Education Research · Literature, Culture, and Criticism · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|