Interpersonal Adaptation, Self-Efficacy, and Metacognitive Skills in Italian Adolescents with Specific Learning Disorders
A Cross-Sectional Study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16946604 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elena Commodari (0000-0002-7647-8743, University of Catania), Valentina Lucia La Rosa (0000-0002-6619-6777, University of Catania, corresponding author), Elisabetta Sagone (0000-0001-5283-4603, University of Catania), Maria Luisa Indiana (University of Catania) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 1034-1049 |
| Publication date | 2022-08-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2174-8144 • E-ISSN: 2254-9625 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/ejihpe12080074 |
| PMID | 36005223 |
| OpenAlex | W4291016670 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 48 |
This study aimed to explore interpersonal adaptation, generalized self-efficacy, and metacognitive skills in a sample of Italian adolescents with and without a specific learning disorder (SLD). A total of 564 secondary and high school students (males = 236; females = 328; age range: 11–19; M = 16.14, SD = 1.70) completed a set of standardized tests assessing social and interpersonal skills (non-affirmation, impulsiveness, narcissism, social preoccupation, and stress in social situations), general self-efficacy, and metacognition. Students with SLD reported a lower interpersonal adaptation than students without SLD. Furthermore, students with SLD were more impulsive and had more problems handling social situations. They also reported lower levels of self-efficacy but higher metacognition scores than peers without SLD. The use of compensatory tools was associated with better interpersonal skills and higher levels of self-efficacy in students with SLD. Finally, using these instruments is predictive of high levels of metacognitive skills in adolescents with SLD. In line with the previous literature, this study showed the presence of a gap between adolescents with and without an SLD in terms of interpersonal adaptation, general self-efficacy, and metacognitive skills in the school context. Further studies are needed on the psychological well-being of adolescents with SLD and especially on the protective role of personal, social, and environmental characteristics
Cognition · Developmental psychology · Interpersonal communication · Interpersonal relationship · Metacognition · Psychiatry · Self-efficacy · Social skills · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Child Development and Digital Technology · Clinical Psychology · Parental Involvement in Education · Psychology · Social Psychology
Trait Anxiety, Emotion Regulation, and Metacognitive Beliefs
VR Gaming for Meta-Skills Training in Special Education
Comparison of self-esteem and quality of life in 8-12-year-old children with ADHD with and without learning disorders
Supporting inclusion in nursing education
Interpersonal adjustment and depression in college students
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students
Executive Perceptions of the Top 10 Soft Skills Needed in Today’s Workplace
Relationships between academic self-efficacy, learning-related emotions, and metacognitive learning strategies with academic performance in medical students
Multifaceted Impact of Self-Efficacy Beliefs on Academic Functioning
Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings
Understanding Power and Rules of Thumb for Determining Sample Sizes
Looking for Special Education in the Swedish After-School Leisure Program Construction and Testing of an Analysis Model
The Level of Metacognitive Thinking Among Students with Learning Disabilities
Relationships between test anxiety and metacognition in Chinese young adults with and without specific learning disabilities
The Self-Efficacy Scale
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |