In Defense of Intellectual Autonomy
A Response to Hendricks
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16948189 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sam Moyo (Sam Moyo African Institute for Agrarian Studies), Praveen Jha (0000-0002-2621-6454, Jawaharlal Nehru University), Paris Yeros (0000-0002-4200-1808, Universidade Federal do ABC) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 295-302 |
| Publication date | 2014-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Agrarian South Journal of Political Economy A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2277-9760 • E-ISSN: 2321-0281 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/2277976014551489 |
| OpenAlex | W2048183917 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 5 |
This article is a response to Fred Hendricks’ critique of our most recent statement on the classical and contemporary agrarian questions. The critique, we believe, is a gross misunderstanding of our position on a variety of issues, including populism, nationalism, the character of the peasantry and industrialization. In defence of our intellectual integrity and autonomy, we restate here our basic positions and outline the trajectory of our collective research projects, in the hope that our positions are put into better perspective
Agrarian society · Agriculture · Autonomy · Industrialisation · Political science · Populism · Sociology · African studies and sociopolitical issues · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · History · Law
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |