An Old Dilemma in Deep Seabed Mining
Free, Prior, and Informed Consent of Indigenous Peoples in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16960927 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Erick Guapizaca Jiménez (0000-0003-0263-9847, University of Michigan, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 118 |
| Pages | 83-87 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | AJIL Unbound (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2398-7723 • E-ISSN: 2398-7723 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/aju.2024.10 |
| OpenAlex | W4393169323 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 5 |
Free, prior, and informed consent of Indigenous peoples (prior consent) is a principle of international law that requires states to consult and obtain the consent of Indigenous peoples before projects or legislation that may affect their rights are approved. This principle is applicable to land-based mining projects unfolding in lands titled to Indigenous peoples. The extractive industry's extension to the deep sea is imminent, with the promising but controversial prospect of critical minerals essential for the transition to renewable energy. The application of prior consent in deep seabed mining is open to question because these projects are being developed beyond Indigenous peoples’ territories and the impacts on their rights would primarily manifest indirectly. In this essay, I focus on the current plans to approve the new International Seabed Authority (ISA) mining code and to award grant exploration and exploitation contracts to mining companies. I put forward three arguments for why the consent principle applies to deep seabed mining projects. First, despite being developed outside lands titled to Indigenous peoples, mining projects can affect the rights of Indigenous peoples, and therefore, their consent is required. Second, the prior consent principle is applicable to deep seabed mining as a matter of treaty law under the International Labour Organization Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention No. 169. Finally, prior consent has the potential to qualify as a rule of international customary law applicable to the “specially affected states” with Indigenous populations under the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
Alternative medicine · Dilemma · Epistemology · Indigenous · Informed consent · International law · Jurisdiction · Law of the sea · Political science · Public international law · Seabed · Corporate Law and Human Rights · International Maritime Law Issues · Law · Medicine · Mining and Resource Management · Philosophy · Ecology · Geology · Oceanography
Considering Indigenous Peoples and local communities in governance of the global ocean commons
The current status of deep-sea mining governance at the International Seabed Authority
Public participation in seabed mining in areas beyond national jurisdiction
Specially-Affected States and the Formation of Custom
Participation on the Edge
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |