The Limitations of European Data Protection As A Model for Global Privacy Regulation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16961012 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shannon Togawa Mercer, Shannon Mercer (Office of the Attorney General, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 114 |
| Pages | 20-25 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | AJIL Unbound (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2398-7723 • E-ISSN: 2398-7723 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/aju.2019.83 |
| OpenAlex | W3000007896 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
The consensus view is that European-style data protection (including the General Data Protection Regulation (2016/679) (GDPR)) is becoming the global standard. But this view is not shared by all, with scholars pointing to divergence between European and American approaches to privacy. Determining the relative influence of each model is important. Regulation of the private sector use of personal data can shape economic and social conditions, from the cost of running a business to the relationships between consumers, companies, and their governments. This essay argues that it is too soon to conclude that the European Union has won the competition to influence global data protection and privacy laws, especially as the United States finds itself in the midst of shaping and defining its own privacy regime. I will explore the GDPR's viability as a global regulatory model, raising reasons to doubt that it will ultimately dominate the privacy regulation market. First, the mere fact that the United States is likely to develop a federal privacy regime that will depart from the European model will be influential in its own right. Second, there are compelling economic reasons for private and public entities to lobby against European-style regulation
Business · Consumer protection · Data Protection Act 1998 · Data Protection Directive · Economics · European union · European Union law · FTC Fair Information Practice · General Data Protection Regulation · Information privacy · Information privacy law · International trade · Law and economics · Political science · Privacy by Design · Privacy law · Privacy policy · Regulatory competition · Right to be forgotten · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection · Law · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |