Attribution by Indictment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 16961329 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Chimène I Keitner (0009-0002-3859-9728, University of California Hastings College of the Law, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 113 |
| Pages | 207-212 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | AJIL Unbound (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2398-7723 • E-ISSN: 2398-7723 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/aju.2019.34 |
| OpenAlex | W3125530024 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 1 |
The challenges of attributing malicious cyber activity—that is, identifying its authors and provenance with a sufficient degree of certainty—are well documented. This essay focuses on a phenomenon that I call “attribution by indictment.” Since 2014, the United States has issued more than a dozen indictments that implicate four foreign states in malicious cyber activity: China, Iran, Russia, and North Korea. Ten of these indictments were issued in 2018, suggesting that this practice is likely to continue and even intensify in the near term. Attribution by indictment uses domestic criminal law, enforced transnationally, to define and enforce certain norms of state behavior in cyberspace. This essay analyzes the U.S. practice of attribution by indictment as a response to malicious cyber activity
Attribution · Business · Certainty · China · Computer security · Cyberspace · Epistemology · Hacker · Indictment · Political science · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies · Digital Transformation in Law · Law · Law, AI, and Intellectual Property · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |